From: Robert J. Bradbury (bradbury@www.aeiveos.com)
Date: Tue Nov 02 1999 - 12:29:10 MST
On Tue, 2 Nov 1999 CampMars@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 11/01/1999 3:40:47 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> hal@finney.org writes:
>
> << How about today? If you were an ET here, and compassionate, but
> determined to allow the civilization to develop roughly on its natural
> course, mightn't you still want to help those around you in a small way? >>
>
> I can give you this much... If we had the technology to do so, and we
> came across a planet were there is the potential for intelligent life and it
> just needed a little genetic boost and some guidance... I think we would
> jump on it. There would just be too much to learn from it. Hell we would
> do it just because it's cool.
This falls into the exact pitfall of applying "our" motivations to
a state of technological development that we don't have. When
we have that level of development, it is impossible to say what
our motivations will be.
I think the only situation that would ever arise where this might
happen in the universe is when you got two planets forming
in the same solar system within the "possible life belt". Then the
discovery of and activity of an intelligent civilization could
influence the evolution of life on the other planet without the
requirement for interstellar travel technology. We would need
some simulations of the formation of planetary systems to see how
probable that is.
Once you have interstellar travel you probably have nanotech and AI as well.
If so, it is questionable whether you have an interest in biosphere
engineering (other than perhaps dismantling them). Why would you
want to do reality engineering with hardware when you can do it with
software?
Robert
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:41 MST