Re: Pats is parts (was Re: Yudkowsky's AI (again))

From: Ross A. Finlayson (RAF@tomco.net)
Date: Thu Mar 25 1999 - 18:58:31 MST

Next message: EvMick@aol.com: "Re: MIL: Warfare Basics"
Previous message: Michael M. Butler: "Pats is parts (was Re: Yudkowsky's AI (again))"
In reply to: Michael M. Butler: "Pats is parts (was Re: Yudkowsky's AI (again))"
Next in thread: Michael M. Butler: "Re: Parts is parts (was Re: Yudkowsky's AI (again))"
Reply: Michael M. Butler: "Re: Parts is parts (was Re: Yudkowsky's AI (again))"
Reply: Dan Fabulich: "Re: Pats is parts (was Re: Yudkowsky's AI (again))"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Michael M. Butler wrote:

> I think he means "atoms", not "organs".
>
> >Pointless. Parts can be grown,
>
> >> mostly just for parts.
> >>
> >> BM

No, I meant organs, synthetic organs.

Ross

--
Ross Andrew Finlayson
202/387-8208
http://www.tomco.net/~raf/
"C is the speed of light."

Next message: EvMick@aol.com: "Re: MIL: Warfare Basics"
Previous message: Michael M. Butler: "Pats is parts (was Re: Yudkowsky's AI (again))"
In reply to: Michael M. Butler: "Pats is parts (was Re: Yudkowsky's AI (again))"
Next in thread: Michael M. Butler: "Re: Parts is parts (was Re: Yudkowsky's AI (again))"
Reply: Michael M. Butler: "Re: Parts is parts (was Re: Yudkowsky's AI (again))"
Reply: Dan Fabulich: "Re: Pats is parts (was Re: Yudkowsky's AI (again))"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:23 MST