Pats is parts (was Re: Yudkowsky's AI (again))

From: Michael M. Butler (butler@comp-lib.org)
Date: Thu Mar 25 1999 - 18:21:39 MST

• Next message: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: Pats is parts (was Re: Yudkowsky's AI (again))"
• Previous message: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: Yudkowsky's AI (again)"
• In reply to: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: Yudkowsky's AI (again)"
• Next in thread: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: Pats is parts (was Re: Yudkowsky's AI (again))"
• Reply: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: Pats is parts (was Re: Yudkowsky's AI (again))"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I think he means "atoms", not "organs".

>Pointless. Parts can be grown,

>> mostly just for parts.
>>
>> BM

• Next message: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: Pats is parts (was Re: Yudkowsky's AI (again))"
• Previous message: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: Yudkowsky's AI (again)"
• In reply to: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: Yudkowsky's AI (again)"
• Next in thread: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: Pats is parts (was Re: Yudkowsky's AI (again))"
• Reply: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: Pats is parts (was Re: Yudkowsky's AI (again))"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:23 MST