From: Scott Badger (wbadger@psyberlink.net)
Date: Sun Dec 13 1998 - 07:32:00 MST
-----Original Message-----
From: Eugene Leitl <eugene.leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de>
To: extropians@extropy.com <extropians@extropy.com>
Date: Saturday, December 12, 1998 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: Greetings..
>Paul Hughes writes:
>
> > Although I have never explored this issue in much depth, I'd have to
agree
> > with you. I think the difference between an institutionalized "insane"
> > person and a functioning genius is much thinner than we want to admit.
>
>I disagree. I think geniuses are both dramatically brighter and
>noticeably more psychically stable than average persons, in the vast
>majority of cases (as if our database was so very large, ho, ho). I
>think brilliant cranks are a yet another urban legend.
>
>'gene
>
I agree with Anders and Gene. Just look at how psychologically
fit and socially adept the members of this list are . . . right? Just
want to add that the logical downward extension of this argument
is that "ignorance is bliss". Uh, I don't think so.
happy holidays
Scott
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:58 MST