blob: 60c489d34c8bfa414d0b6f38ae0ad18d932905ad (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <wendel@314t.com>) id 1V1qFC-0002eP-J2
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 24 Jul 2013 04:00:06 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from mail-la0-f48.google.com ([209.85.215.48])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1V1qFA-0002Oc-Dd
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 24 Jul 2013 04:00:06 +0000
Received: by mail-la0-f48.google.com with SMTP id hi8so204385lab.21
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:59:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s=20120113;
h=sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer
:x-gm-message-state;
bh=7GkW5fmq1/r7dZuUR2FEGEwYM+0YhOKWk9xVeowtjsc=;
b=euQGh7UHBkWecqsTFhfbl9n2IQdyzOLQ4ylYzH3PgDCeA+ERGcgZMuPAGK96NwLK3S
NfYD9KotJRJmfoCTIcCFNoLT0G1cwsRNfnZh3AE+A5cjS5MuIvDqX1HZfPplI6Imeo3P
slWzW+70iINCDqXz6NrgoLNQToxkVIOx2ocJkL39GPR5cc0/Qv0PZoFksHs2vLeCGinz
KzeDEFHtVWFi5InC25j8PlMT2hQ/iVlIrGcqyphio7vn3LUENmjYKV/b2qmNas55EmVI
JWy4x3puVDlkLvYbYK/hfqbnqjES+W3gVAPurUheaM5wdcvygmirfoC3EAcnz344ocMQ
mrXg==
X-Received: by 10.152.178.229 with SMTP id db5mr1179581lac.33.1374638075531;
Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (assk.torservers.net. [78.108.63.46])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
k10sm13773121lbl.10.2013.07.23.20.54.32
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: w grabhive <wendel@314t.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
From: Wendell <w@grabhive.com>
In-Reply-To: <8A6BD408-352F-4346-AF81-3C63BD0ED93B@jrbobdobbs.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 05:54:25 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <10A07C03-7BAF-4312-9D43-827D03034EAE@grabhive.com>
References: <CANEZrP2GvgZP_1z3EoSs3p+db7tZB6JfEVAewLpGE5eRpGgR3w@mail.gmail.com>
<CANg8-dAzc2ENivTpr6S=zoUkfGyBM6j=OUb8-_wLTFQqLRmnzw@mail.gmail.com>
<8A6BD408-352F-4346-AF81-3C63BD0ED93B@jrbobdobbs.org>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlH0wkuOECtNj+Xb6q/GgW3WOIZvwP7ayayUt9QnY2YWAcTPX2F1LO9tORQ/DEK6nkO4nU5
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1V1qFA-0002Oc-Dd
Subject: [Bitcoin-development] Endianness (was: Linux packaging letter)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 04:00:06 -0000
Forking for curiosity's sake:
Is there a substantial barrier to endian independence in the Bitcoin =
codebase?
-wendell
grabhive.com | twitter.com/grabhive
On Jul 24, 2013, at 3:45 AM, Douglas Huff wrote:
> The fact that you're even trying to package and/or at some point have =
packaged and shipped big endian binaries is straight up *NEGLIGENT.*
|
