Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1V1qFC-0002eP-J2 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 04:00:06 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from mail-la0-f48.google.com ([209.85.215.48]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1V1qFA-0002Oc-Dd for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 04:00:06 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f48.google.com with SMTP id hi8so204385lab.21 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:59:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=7GkW5fmq1/r7dZuUR2FEGEwYM+0YhOKWk9xVeowtjsc=; b=euQGh7UHBkWecqsTFhfbl9n2IQdyzOLQ4ylYzH3PgDCeA+ERGcgZMuPAGK96NwLK3S NfYD9KotJRJmfoCTIcCFNoLT0G1cwsRNfnZh3AE+A5cjS5MuIvDqX1HZfPplI6Imeo3P slWzW+70iINCDqXz6NrgoLNQToxkVIOx2ocJkL39GPR5cc0/Qv0PZoFksHs2vLeCGinz KzeDEFHtVWFi5InC25j8PlMT2hQ/iVlIrGcqyphio7vn3LUENmjYKV/b2qmNas55EmVI JWy4x3puVDlkLvYbYK/hfqbnqjES+W3gVAPurUheaM5wdcvygmirfoC3EAcnz344ocMQ mrXg== X-Received: by 10.152.178.229 with SMTP id db5mr1179581lac.33.1374638075531; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:54:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (assk.torservers.net. [78.108.63.46]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k10sm13773121lbl.10.2013.07.23.20.54.32 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:54:34 -0700 (PDT) Sender: w grabhive Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) From: Wendell In-Reply-To: <8A6BD408-352F-4346-AF81-3C63BD0ED93B@jrbobdobbs.org> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 05:54:25 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <10A07C03-7BAF-4312-9D43-827D03034EAE@grabhive.com> References: <8A6BD408-352F-4346-AF81-3C63BD0ED93B@jrbobdobbs.org> To: Bitcoin Dev X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlH0wkuOECtNj+Xb6q/GgW3WOIZvwP7ayayUt9QnY2YWAcTPX2F1LO9tORQ/DEK6nkO4nU5 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. X-Headers-End: 1V1qFA-0002Oc-Dd Subject: [Bitcoin-development] Endianness (was: Linux packaging letter) X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 04:00:06 -0000 Forking for curiosity's sake: Is there a substantial barrier to endian independence in the Bitcoin = codebase? -wendell grabhive.com | twitter.com/grabhive On Jul 24, 2013, at 3:45 AM, Douglas Huff wrote: > The fact that you're even trying to package and/or at some point have = packaged and shipped big endian binaries is straight up *NEGLIGENT.*