1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
|
Return-Path: <jlrubin@mit.edu>
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::137])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB079C000B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 28 Jan 2022 16:39:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7041E408E4
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 28 Jan 2022 16:39:17 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 8U-IBh9ZoNfa
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 28 Jan 2022 16:39:16 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A62CF41D3C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 28 Jan 2022 16:39:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-lj1-f179.google.com (mail-lj1-f179.google.com
[209.85.208.179]) (authenticated bits=0)
(User authenticated as jlrubin@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 20SGdA12026284
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT)
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 11:39:11 -0500
Received: by mail-lj1-f179.google.com with SMTP id b14so9889885ljb.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 28 Jan 2022 08:39:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530mfAirI25EaRNVnUATLWJlw1zegV9TydbXLcQFc2hTf++iw7Ow
kVKKnBXiNx41eDflczK/TWl4HYnnYBm98SsiebM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyLjMRC1f5+LPrFUBKm1Xp5PKZwgJt4nibypUok0vSYMPJh5ny8CZTiB0Qm5d/+q3TAtuHTW9t2GRZ0K27ia4s=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a811:: with SMTP id l17mr6337077ljq.81.1643387949724;
Fri, 28 Jan 2022 08:39:09 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMZUoK=pkZuovtifBzdqhoyegzG+9hRTFEc7fG9nZPDK4KbU3w@mail.gmail.com>
<CAD5xwhhwqJ_AETAb3p_zUZmRX-Dzh8J9G984zwEs=KFsGN8aNQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAMZUoKmU1cwUAQaBv5m8oo8H3TWBvgsZ_OkQaMC0n0+3cpFtWg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPfvXfLr4n6RsS6VbEZR59=MRwAx41Crx88ko8-qnRXW4nFYGA@mail.gmail.com>
<XvyRH0U3-np2xDZhhaIgYDXFcTvAnLkP5n-7c58f1bMuh6jAvlF_22n2yquiyoFXYl0s7zQm_3zp46Fzn_tJkxN2Lsz6N75lJmqAS2rlCa4=@protonmail.com>
<20220128141740.GA3331@erisian.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <20220128141740.GA3331@erisian.com.au>
From: Jeremy <jlrubin@mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 08:38:58 -0800
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAD5xwhhk5iXQrbk7o22JQNxiS9e22NDDYmSctMPL4j3jYcnn2g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAD5xwhhk5iXQrbk7o22JQNxiS9e22NDDYmSctMPL4j3jYcnn2g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f8bb4205d6a71253"
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] TXHASH + CHECKSIGFROMSTACKVERIFY in lieu of CTV
and ANYPREVOUT
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 16:39:18 -0000
--000000000000f8bb4205d6a71253
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
I probably need to reset it -- I ran into some issues with the IBD latch
bug IIRC and had difficulty producing new blocks.
I sent funds as a manual faucet to at least one person... not aware of
anyone else finding use for the signet. In part this is due to the fact
that in order to run a signet, you also kind of need to run some kind of
faucet on it, which wasn't readily available when I launched it previously.
I think I can use https://github.com/jsarenik/bitcoin-faucet-shell now
though.
Usually people are using Regtest to play around with CTV less so Signet.
There is value in a signet, but I don't think that "there's not a signet
for it" is a blocking issue v.s. nice to have.
--
@JeremyRubin <https://twitter.com/JeremyRubin>
<https://twitter.com/JeremyRubin>
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 6:18 AM Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 01:14:07PM +0000, Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
> > There is not even a custom signet with CTV (as far as I know)
>
> https://twitter.com/jeremyrubin/status/1339699281192656897
>
>
> signetchallenge=512102946e8ba8eca597194e7ed90377d9bbebc5d17a9609ab3e35e706612ee882759351ae
> addnode=50.18.75.225
>
> But I think there's only been a single coinbase consolidation tx, and no
> actual CTV transactions?
>
> Cheers,
> aj
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
--000000000000f8bb4205d6a71253
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:arial,he=
lvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#000000">I probably need to reset =
it -- I ran into some issues with the IBD latch bug IIRC and had difficulty=
producing new blocks.</div><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-fami=
ly:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#000000"><br></div><div=
class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;fo=
nt-size:small;color:#000000">I sent funds as a manual faucet to at least on=
e person... not aware of anyone else finding use for the signet. In part th=
is is due to the fact that in order to run a signet, you also kind of need =
to run some kind of faucet on it, which wasn't readily available when I=
launched it previously. I think I can use=C2=A0<a href=3D"https://github.c=
om/jsarenik/bitcoin-faucet-shell">https://github.com/jsarenik/bitcoin-fauce=
t-shell</a> now though.</div><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-fam=
ily:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#000000"><br></div><di=
v class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;f=
ont-size:small;color:#000000">Usually people are using Regtest to play arou=
nd with CTV less so Signet. There is value in a signet, but I don't thi=
nk that "there's not a signet for it" is a blocking issue v.s=
. nice to have.</div><div><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signature" data-s=
martmail=3D"gmail_signature"><div dir=3D"ltr">--<br><a href=3D"https://twit=
ter.com/JeremyRubin" target=3D"_blank">@JeremyRubin</a><a href=3D"https://t=
witter.com/JeremyRubin" target=3D"_blank"></a></div></div></div><br></div><=
br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Fri,=
Jan 28, 2022 at 6:18 AM Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev <<a href=3D"mailt=
o:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.=
org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"marg=
in:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-l=
eft-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 01:14:=
07PM +0000, Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev wrote:<br>
> There is not even a custom signet with CTV (as far as I know) <br>
<br>
<a href=3D"https://twitter.com/jeremyrubin/status/1339699281192656897" rel=
=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://twitter.com/jeremyrubin/status/13=
39699281192656897</a><br>
<br>
signetchallenge=3D512102946e8ba8eca597194e7ed90377d9bbebc5d17a9609ab3e35e70=
6612ee882759351ae<br>
addnode=3D50.18.75.225<br>
<br>
But I think there's only been a single coinbase consolidation tx, and n=
o<br>
actual CTV transactions?<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
aj<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">=
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
--000000000000f8bb4205d6a71253--
|
