Return-Path: Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::137]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB079C000B for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 16:39:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7041E408E4 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 16:39:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8U-IBh9ZoNfa for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 16:39:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A62CF41D3C for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 16:39:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lj1-f179.google.com (mail-lj1-f179.google.com [209.85.208.179]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as jlrubin@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 20SGdA12026284 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 11:39:11 -0500 Received: by mail-lj1-f179.google.com with SMTP id b14so9889885ljb.0 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 08:39:11 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530mfAirI25EaRNVnUATLWJlw1zegV9TydbXLcQFc2hTf++iw7Ow kVKKnBXiNx41eDflczK/TWl4HYnnYBm98SsiebM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyLjMRC1f5+LPrFUBKm1Xp5PKZwgJt4nibypUok0vSYMPJh5ny8CZTiB0Qm5d/+q3TAtuHTW9t2GRZ0K27ia4s= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a811:: with SMTP id l17mr6337077ljq.81.1643387949724; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 08:39:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220128141740.GA3331@erisian.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20220128141740.GA3331@erisian.com.au> From: Jeremy Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 08:38:58 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: Anthony Towns , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f8bb4205d6a71253" Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] TXHASH + CHECKSIGFROMSTACKVERIFY in lieu of CTV and ANYPREVOUT X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 16:39:18 -0000 --000000000000f8bb4205d6a71253 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I probably need to reset it -- I ran into some issues with the IBD latch bug IIRC and had difficulty producing new blocks. I sent funds as a manual faucet to at least one person... not aware of anyone else finding use for the signet. In part this is due to the fact that in order to run a signet, you also kind of need to run some kind of faucet on it, which wasn't readily available when I launched it previously. I think I can use https://github.com/jsarenik/bitcoin-faucet-shell now though. Usually people are using Regtest to play around with CTV less so Signet. There is value in a signet, but I don't think that "there's not a signet for it" is a blocking issue v.s. nice to have. -- @JeremyRubin On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 6:18 AM Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 01:14:07PM +0000, Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev > wrote: > > There is not even a custom signet with CTV (as far as I know) > > https://twitter.com/jeremyrubin/status/1339699281192656897 > > > signetchallenge=512102946e8ba8eca597194e7ed90377d9bbebc5d17a9609ab3e35e706612ee882759351ae > addnode=50.18.75.225 > > But I think there's only been a single coinbase consolidation tx, and no > actual CTV transactions? > > Cheers, > aj > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > --000000000000f8bb4205d6a71253 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I probably need to reset = it -- I ran into some issues with the IBD latch bug IIRC and had difficulty= producing new blocks.

I sent funds as a manual faucet to at least on= e person... not aware of anyone else finding use for the signet. In part th= is is due to the fact that in order to run a signet, you also kind of need = to run some kind of faucet on it, which wasn't readily available when I= launched it previously. I think I can use=C2=A0https://github.com/jsarenik/bitcoin-fauce= t-shell now though.

Usually people are using Regtest to play arou= nd with CTV less so Signet. There is value in a signet, but I don't thi= nk that "there's not a signet for it" is a blocking issue v.s= . nice to have.
<= br>
On Fri,= Jan 28, 2022 at 6:18 AM Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.= org> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 01:14:= 07PM +0000, Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> There is not even a custom signet with CTV (as far as I know)

https://twitter.com/jeremyrubin/status/13= 39699281192656897

signetchallenge=3D512102946e8ba8eca597194e7ed90377d9bbebc5d17a9609ab3e35e70= 6612ee882759351ae
addnode=3D50.18.75.225

But I think there's only been a single coinbase consolidation tx, and n= o
actual CTV transactions?

Cheers,
aj

_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
= bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail= man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
--000000000000f8bb4205d6a71253--