summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/cf/83d9300f0f068c37f13099c39368ce68756545
blob: fbce3fb7a93db306b5885d67882942e9a72f7742 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
Return-Path: <tomh@thinlink.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C46128E3
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 21 Aug 2015 23:08:53 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pd0-f177.google.com (mail-pd0-f177.google.com
	[209.85.192.177])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68F5F11C
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 21 Aug 2015 23:08:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pdbmi9 with SMTP id mi9so31184736pdb.3
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:08:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=l5iC3TYKLT4FCT6q6Yfo24pZBG6QRA8iTIIFHpVGn6w=;
	b=CSPvoJ8P6BjiWHNONyQ6/kgEhTKsdu+LcvcyoUIm9Fxg2fhWNJUS5XH33yO8ZlkcXA
	s5MxyQ2NNlMgKvbw1JMqmEh1KeuR49ywQfsw9s+QsKIaXPlgw/pHwuIAgzXPIcI+b1qV
	4/KEgPLwCAcq67VSSYenSa4Gp1zFDoGOs1v+RwlMpeF/tfvR2VGuzlnuMFJVatx2l4ao
	yPoVTWpT0Y74oBLsWwhjZs6kfZTJWSNhlRDDtQkz6WGwywNQLqGK/i7x4IB3MKam0LVR
	ssoVF9zG5Iyw90mz0+016b+sjZQIKks4C4B3aC61aWYrkDEJNVu9V7FB/spV20WuQOD6
	kc8w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlwTBkOH2s6o2WZjWoDatpzhIQHj+6VXVQ0er0lhsjoNj/J69o1oEmpzIgowJGfNpzRvq4e
X-Received: by 10.70.13.37 with SMTP id e5mr21603204pdc.107.1440198533137;
	Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:08:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.89] (99-8-65-117.lightspeed.davlca.sbcglobal.net.
	[99.8.65.117]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
	gx1sm8974584pbc.29.2015.08.21.16.08.51
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
	Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <55D6AD19.10305@mattcorallo.com>
	<CADm_WcZJEe4fz4dLYKeOzC0CWbM=-o92BvEF0qiGvNwyMjrEiA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150821055534.GA27259@muck>
	<CADm_WcanqF7oHn7huKuYP8iFWmY4XE58tG01M_Nqg9qx6YFu9A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150821060716.GA31674@muck>
From: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>
Message-ID: <55D7AF85.2020707@thinlink.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:08:53 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20150821060716.GA31674@muck>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Revisiting NODE_BLOOM: Proposed BIP
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 23:08:53 -0000

On 8/20/2015 11:07 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:

> I run a number of high speed nodes and while I don't have historical
> logs handy over time, I've noticed a drop from about %5-%10 SPV
> clients at any one time tocloser to %1


Just checked mine and found 20.4% bitcoinj connections.