Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C46128E3 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 23:08:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-pd0-f177.google.com (mail-pd0-f177.google.com [209.85.192.177]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68F5F11C for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 23:08:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pdbmi9 with SMTP id mi9so31184736pdb.3 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:08:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=l5iC3TYKLT4FCT6q6Yfo24pZBG6QRA8iTIIFHpVGn6w=; b=CSPvoJ8P6BjiWHNONyQ6/kgEhTKsdu+LcvcyoUIm9Fxg2fhWNJUS5XH33yO8ZlkcXA s5MxyQ2NNlMgKvbw1JMqmEh1KeuR49ywQfsw9s+QsKIaXPlgw/pHwuIAgzXPIcI+b1qV 4/KEgPLwCAcq67VSSYenSa4Gp1zFDoGOs1v+RwlMpeF/tfvR2VGuzlnuMFJVatx2l4ao yPoVTWpT0Y74oBLsWwhjZs6kfZTJWSNhlRDDtQkz6WGwywNQLqGK/i7x4IB3MKam0LVR ssoVF9zG5Iyw90mz0+016b+sjZQIKks4C4B3aC61aWYrkDEJNVu9V7FB/spV20WuQOD6 kc8w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlwTBkOH2s6o2WZjWoDatpzhIQHj+6VXVQ0er0lhsjoNj/J69o1oEmpzIgowJGfNpzRvq4e X-Received: by 10.70.13.37 with SMTP id e5mr21603204pdc.107.1440198533137; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:08:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.89] (99-8-65-117.lightspeed.davlca.sbcglobal.net. [99.8.65.117]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id gx1sm8974584pbc.29.2015.08.21.16.08.51 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:08:51 -0700 (PDT) To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org References: <55D6AD19.10305@mattcorallo.com> <20150821055534.GA27259@muck> <20150821060716.GA31674@muck> From: Tom Harding Message-ID: <55D7AF85.2020707@thinlink.com> Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:08:53 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150821060716.GA31674@muck> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Revisiting NODE_BLOOM: Proposed BIP X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 23:08:53 -0000 On 8/20/2015 11:07 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote: > I run a number of high speed nodes and while I don't have historical > logs handy over time, I've noticed a drop from about %5-%10 SPV > clients at any one time tocloser to %1 Just checked mine and found 20.4% bitcoinj connections.