1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
|
Return-Path: <staf@stafverhaegen.be>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE02C360
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 2 Apr 2017 19:02:10 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from lvps83-169-4-30.dedicated.hosteurope.de
(lvps83-169-4-30.dedicated.hosteurope.de [83.169.4.30])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2230A7C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 2 Apr 2017 19:02:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 7867 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2017 21:02:07 +0200
Received: from unknown (HELO hpdc7800) (10.0.0.1)
by 10.0.0.2 with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 2 Apr 2017 21:02:07 +0200
Message-ID: <1491159722.7267.5.camel@stafverhaegen.be>
From: Staf Verhaegen <staf@stafverhaegen.be>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2017 21:02:02 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAD1TkXuEE4ajE071R32skuHOq-0QHJuaO0OpztfSq=ZXpvd6Pw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFzgq-xizPMNqfvW11nUhd6HmfZu8aGjcR9fshEsf6o5HOt_dA@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+KqGkpFW8qDPVgY+11o_CC+6FMWUNUZ7REHJKYM9-3wbrUwYw@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDrN5Wt9+2sVAjRiDG_axHmxF+iFujvApBMqrs-GjBG4pg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAD1TkXuEE4ajE071R32skuHOq-0QHJuaO0OpztfSq=ZXpvd6Pw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256";
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-+I+6G24rhSS+p4CIZcTh"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 (3.12.11-22.el7)
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR
autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 02 Apr 2017 19:23:43 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Hard fork proposal from last week's meeting
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2017 19:02:11 -0000
--=-+I+6G24rhSS+p4CIZcTh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Jared Lee Richardson via bitcoin-dev schreef op wo 29-03-2017 om 12:07
[-0700]:
>=20
> It is all very unhealthy for Bitcoin. Both sides need to accept that
> microtransactions from all humans cannot go on-chain, and that never
> increasing the blocksize doesn't mean millions of home users will run
> nodes. The node argument breaks down economically and the
> microtransaction argument is an impossible mountain for a blockchain
> to climb.
What annoys me are people that seem to think that in order to promote
layer two scaling on-chain scaling has to be severely limited. I am
convinced that in order for layer 2 to flourish enough on-chain
bandwidth has to be available, not artificial scarceness.
In order to allow more on-chain bandwidth also sharding solutions should
be investigated so not every transactions has to pass through each node
and without the need of channels but protocol between nodes.
greets,
Staf.
--=-+I+6G24rhSS+p4CIZcTh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iF4EABEIAAYFAljhSq8ACgkQWIjyN0LdGqyQ3gEAtUo93EkF+lQRatwYj3xw0jU9
a8W7DBvyv0bIYTTevFcBAL54oiaLWDWyS3ip+dIhtKA5i8VaOARYA4GPAEbH0f7A
=iCRM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-+I+6G24rhSS+p4CIZcTh--
|
