Message-ID: <1491159722.7267.5.camel@stafverhaegen.be>
From: Staf Verhaegen <staf@stafverhaegen.be>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2017 21:02:02 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAD1TkXuEE4ajE071R32skuHOq-0QHJuaO0OpztfSq=ZXpvd6Pw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFzgq-xizPMNqfvW11nUhd6HmfZu8aGjcR9fshEsf6o5HOt_dA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+KqGkpFW8qDPVgY+11o_CC+6FMWUNUZ7REHJKYM9-3wbrUwYw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABm2gDrN5Wt9+2sVAjRiDG_axHmxF+iFujvApBMqrs-GjBG4pg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAD1TkXuEE4ajE071R32skuHOq-0QHJuaO0OpztfSq=ZXpvd6Pw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-+I+6G24rhSS+p4CIZcTh"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Hard fork proposal from last week's meeting
Precedence: list


--=-+I+6G24rhSS+p4CIZcTh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Jared Lee Richardson via bitcoin-dev schreef op wo 29-03-2017 om 12:07
[-0700]:

>=20
> It is all very unhealthy for Bitcoin.  Both sides need to accept that
> microtransactions from all humans cannot go on-chain, and that never
> increasing the blocksize doesn't mean millions of home users will run
> nodes.  The node argument breaks down economically and the
> microtransaction argument is an impossible mountain for a blockchain
> to climb.

What annoys me are people that seem to think that in order to promote
layer two scaling on-chain scaling has to be severely limited. I am
convinced that in order for layer 2 to flourish enough on-chain
bandwidth has to be available, not artificial scarceness.
In order to allow more on-chain bandwidth also sharding solutions should
be investigated so not every transactions has to pass through each node
and without the need of channels but protocol between nodes.

greets,
Staf.


--=-+I+6G24rhSS+p4CIZcTh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iF4EABEIAAYFAljhSq8ACgkQWIjyN0LdGqyQ3gEAtUo93EkF+lQRatwYj3xw0jU9
a8W7DBvyv0bIYTTevFcBAL54oiaLWDWyS3ip+dIhtKA5i8VaOARYA4GPAEbH0f7A
=iCRM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-+I+6G24rhSS+p4CIZcTh--