1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
|
Return-Path: <darosior@protonmail.com>
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679DBC0037
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 16 Dec 2023 14:10:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C07D40146
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 16 Dec 2023 14:10:23 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 3C07D40146
Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com header.i=@protonmail.com
header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=protonmail3 header.b=CLnkEITn
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id QVpNhApFt8zS
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 16 Dec 2023 14:10:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-0201.mail-europe.com (mail-0201.mail-europe.com
[51.77.79.158])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA22B400BF
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 16 Dec 2023 14:10:21 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org AA22B400BF
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com;
s=protonmail3; t=1702735813; x=1702995013;
bh=v3jQRV+P/1r8gfQs+b8J89UeAP5g5idFF6aZ+Jm8jAU=;
h=Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:
Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector;
b=CLnkEITn0alRDCNnQsCYqlq0Qu8+ecG45z+m3z7iElfLlUvUa8YPITzODcM2iO7UY
n9KDlzGmhsB/JOVKILpAzHJpPYduLhclS0n+V+TGrbTV8oWQJGQkydZBJEBU84+CHA
1OShDyRMOv2CS2pI8ATiixjo8Palx0cbUNetdmQAeG1R0glDw/mrPbIph5KhHSoX/J
j+u1syxK1MazNe5YypcClLFs4hsziEbNU9oh1++vncNhpouyjKxt3DEkddXIybKxp6
jrWExgMEyYVCGG9DbBWw+/D8pdMtcPlFafJaWCPmr4VX+ge4gfeHjfHYX//t2uAovu
A4KcKDSe2D+Dg==
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 14:10:08 +0000
To: "bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
From: Antoine Poinsot <darosior@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <qCTW51rFF01GBS4D2xALWGMI_OTJavtqEJ5ztfOD1E65mA-Iwzc0Z8OqmGbGCmi2WxNq85cIMvOXD6qYvGOYGKF_QT5ACRd_E9UmisdIet4=@protonmail.com>
Feedback-ID: 7060259:user:proton
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 17 Dec 2023 02:12:06 +0000
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] BIP number request for wallet policies
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 14:10:23 -0000
Wallet policies, a standard for implementing support for output descriptors=
in hardware signing devices was introduced by Salvatore Ingala a year and =
a half ago [0].
A pull request to the BIP repository was opened more than a year ago [1]. I=
t's been waiting for a BIP number to be assigned since then.
There is now 3 majors hardware signing devices using this standard in produ=
ction (Ledger, BitBox02, Jade). There has been multiple pings on the PR in =
the past year to get assigned a BIP number.
It would be nice to hear from the BIP editors about their expectations from=
the author, so we can move forward with this document specifying what's al=
ready become an industry standard.
Antoine Poinsot
[0] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-May/020492=
.html
[1] https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1389
|
