Return-Path: Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679DBC0037 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2023 14:10:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C07D40146 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2023 14:10:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 3C07D40146 Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com header.i=@protonmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=protonmail3 header.b=CLnkEITn X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QVpNhApFt8zS for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2023 14:10:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-0201.mail-europe.com (mail-0201.mail-europe.com [51.77.79.158]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA22B400BF for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2023 14:10:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org AA22B400BF DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1702735813; x=1702995013; bh=v3jQRV+P/1r8gfQs+b8J89UeAP5g5idFF6aZ+Jm8jAU=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date: Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=CLnkEITn0alRDCNnQsCYqlq0Qu8+ecG45z+m3z7iElfLlUvUa8YPITzODcM2iO7UY n9KDlzGmhsB/JOVKILpAzHJpPYduLhclS0n+V+TGrbTV8oWQJGQkydZBJEBU84+CHA 1OShDyRMOv2CS2pI8ATiixjo8Palx0cbUNetdmQAeG1R0glDw/mrPbIph5KhHSoX/J j+u1syxK1MazNe5YypcClLFs4hsziEbNU9oh1++vncNhpouyjKxt3DEkddXIybKxp6 jrWExgMEyYVCGG9DbBWw+/D8pdMtcPlFafJaWCPmr4VX+ge4gfeHjfHYX//t2uAovu A4KcKDSe2D+Dg== Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 14:10:08 +0000 To: "bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" From: Antoine Poinsot Message-ID: Feedback-ID: 7060259:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 17 Dec 2023 02:12:06 +0000 Subject: [bitcoin-dev] BIP number request for wallet policies X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 14:10:23 -0000 Wallet policies, a standard for implementing support for output descriptors= in hardware signing devices was introduced by Salvatore Ingala a year and = a half ago [0]. A pull request to the BIP repository was opened more than a year ago [1]. I= t's been waiting for a BIP number to be assigned since then. There is now 3 majors hardware signing devices using this standard in produ= ction (Ledger, BitBox02, Jade). There has been multiple pings on the PR in = the past year to get assigned a BIP number. It would be nice to hear from the BIP editors about their expectations from= the author, so we can move forward with this document specifying what's al= ready become an industry standard. Antoine Poinsot [0] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-May/020492= .html [1] https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1389