1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
|
Return-Path: <stick@satoshilabs.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E422E941
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 5 Sep 2017 15:49:38 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail.sldev.cz (mail.sldev.cz [51.254.7.247])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F708271
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 5 Sep 2017 15:49:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.sldev.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AAB7EB4A;
Tue, 5 Sep 2017 16:01:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sldev.cz
Received: from mail.sldev.cz ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mail.sl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id vCQ2-JrKpPko; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 16:01:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from tetra.site (unknown [10.8.8.107])
by mail.sldev.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C21DE4D0;
Tue, 5 Sep 2017 16:01:48 +0000 (UTC)
To: shiva sitamraju <shiva@blockonomics.co>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
References: <CABuOfuiz9U=ZPWRUfVXHgBekZ74B4zkUikg6Svxbr6jrJA5Vyw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Pavol Rusnak <stick@satoshilabs.com>
Message-ID: <9da64df3-c6a9-c232-c801-f379a6d65e44@satoshilabs.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 17:41:37 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABuOfuiz9U=ZPWRUfVXHgBekZ74B4zkUikg6Svxbr6jrJA5Vyw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled
version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP49 Derivation scheme changes
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 15:49:39 -0000
On 05/09/17 09:10, shiva sitamraju via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> 0x042393df , sxpr , segwit mainnet private key
> 0x04239377 , sxpb , segwit mainnet public key
> 0x04222463 , stpb , segwit testnet public key
> 0x042224cc , stpr , segwit testnet private key
I am fine with both your proposal and proposal from Thomas
({x,y,z}{pub,prv}).
Let's just decide ASAP which one we'll use.
--
Best Regards / S pozdravom,
Pavol "stick" Rusnak
CTO, SatoshiLabs
|
