Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E422E941 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 15:49:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.sldev.cz (mail.sldev.cz [51.254.7.247]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F708271 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 15:49:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sldev.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AAB7EB4A; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 16:01:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sldev.cz Received: from mail.sldev.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vCQ2-JrKpPko; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 16:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tetra.site (unknown [10.8.8.107]) by mail.sldev.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C21DE4D0; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 16:01:48 +0000 (UTC) To: shiva sitamraju , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion References: From: Pavol Rusnak Message-ID: <9da64df3-c6a9-c232-c801-f379a6d65e44@satoshilabs.com> Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 17:41:37 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP49 Derivation scheme changes X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 15:49:39 -0000 On 05/09/17 09:10, shiva sitamraju via bitcoin-dev wrote: > 0x042393df , sxpr , segwit mainnet private key > 0x04239377 , sxpb , segwit mainnet public key > 0x04222463 , stpb , segwit testnet public key > 0x042224cc , stpr , segwit testnet private key I am fine with both your proposal and proposal from Thomas ({x,y,z}{pub,prv}). Let's just decide ASAP which one we'll use. -- Best Regards / S pozdravom, Pavol "stick" Rusnak CTO, SatoshiLabs