1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A728FBC5
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:25:33 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail148101.authsmtp.com (outmail148101.authsmtp.com
[62.13.148.101])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08165118
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:25:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c237.authsmtp.com (mail-c237.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.237])
by punt18.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t5UGPVtt092973;
Tue, 30 Jun 2015 17:25:31 +0100 (BST)
Received: from savin.petertodd.org (75-119-251-161.dsl.teksavvy.com
[75.119.251.161]) (authenticated bits=128)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t5UGPQHZ077578
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
Tue, 30 Jun 2015 17:25:29 +0100 (BST)
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 12:25:26 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Venzen Khaosan <venzen@mail.bihthai.net>
Message-ID: <20150630162526.GA8479@savin.petertodd.org>
References: <CALgxB7uvtKCNM-nH+aqqPa4KNf5O6Gx4GmgZY7Oq8=A24wCrfA@mail.gmail.com>
<5592C0A3.8050008@mail.bihthai.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5592C0A3.8050008@mail.bihthai.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Server-Quench: 9f8c7642-1f44-11e5-9f74-002590a135d3
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aQdMdQIUEkAaAgsB AmMbWlNeUlh7W2o7 bA9PbARUfEhLXhtr
VklWR1pVCwQmRRlk cX5/KnNycAJDf3Y+ bE5rWD5SCkwpckB5
QFNVQ2kCeGZhPWUC WRZfcx5UcAFPdx8U a1N6AHBDAzANdhEy
HhM4ODE3eDlSNhEd aAUKJlFaWkcZE3Y9 QRsYEDw0EAUCXz00
NB06K1kaHV0NKRd6 KV8sUEkVexQWBwRE G1AvSCNUKVgHSmI0
DQpGFV8ZDXVbTCpQ ShEvJBIAHjsaWyxT HkZMUBxHASdCWyoA
UzdPX2UxCxAgb1k2 OzgeOklhPjd6AxNL AVUSS09AJEA1PwhP KiNV
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1024:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 75.119.251.161/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Block size increase oppositionists: please
clearly define what you need done to increase block size to a static 8MB,
and help do it
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:25:33 -0000
--W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:15:31PM +0700, Venzen Khaosan wrote:
> > Do what's best for Bitcoin and define what needs to get done to
> > agree to a simple block size increase to a static 8MB.
>=20
> And this then leads back to the core issue: if an 8MB blocksize
> excludes many on this list from testnet, then the proposed 8MB blocks
> will exclude a lot of mainnet participants (miners) and degrade the
> quality of diversity and decentralization.
>=20
> How about testing at double the capacity: 2MB?
Which of course raises another issue: if that was the plan, then all you
can do is double capacity, with no clear way to scaling beyond that.
Why bother?
--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000001599522de3e8ed28f0189ddccfa1d6db5eb380cacffc79d7
--W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQGrBAEBCACVBQJVksLzXhSAAAAAABUAQGJsb2NraGFzaEBiaXRjb2luLm9yZzAw
MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAxNTk5NTIyZGUzZThlZDI4ZjAxODlkZGNjZmExZDZkYjVl
YjM4MGNhY2ZmYzc5ZDcvFIAAAAAAFQARcGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3JncGV0
ZUBwZXRlcnRvZC5vcmcACgkQJIFAPaXwkftcjQf+MY67fBkATYmd9/5FT2/y2bPr
Nztijy6GTuOyzo9GDdGmKfweQxYZ17hx6HDrep9jOb7d38LEEeAVC5AQGeA05PDQ
2/SmdWPkwKsqNOkbGEZALrePOhCdMchYJLcMRC1bkO0FOHqrBGGiCkXC5kVELFoF
gwfIFpBbg+d4EEYRti2V4+T3+Ael/j+jc8tX6fODtDHubyyQUtuEg2Chtt+lTM/I
bFHopgUGfJzXpsbuUZD2pgBt4hmxPtBgtVSj3T7Zt05ybZH2+X24Fm+8RYeFbb8U
f3sjLqqEgPBkuHOcIGXOB09Pf+wXnMrHWRdQGXlM8p9ae2Lrsbx9x7KyPpfBFQ==
=X6Rm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA--
|
