Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A728FBC5 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:25:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from outmail148101.authsmtp.com (outmail148101.authsmtp.com [62.13.148.101]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08165118 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:25:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-c237.authsmtp.com (mail-c237.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.237]) by punt18.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t5UGPVtt092973; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 17:25:31 +0100 (BST) Received: from savin.petertodd.org (75-119-251-161.dsl.teksavvy.com [75.119.251.161]) (authenticated bits=128) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t5UGPQHZ077578 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Jun 2015 17:25:29 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 12:25:26 -0400 From: Peter Todd To: Venzen Khaosan Message-ID: <20150630162526.GA8479@savin.petertodd.org> References: <5592C0A3.8050008@mail.bihthai.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5592C0A3.8050008@mail.bihthai.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Server-Quench: 9f8c7642-1f44-11e5-9f74-002590a135d3 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR aQdMdQIUEkAaAgsB AmMbWlNeUlh7W2o7 bA9PbARUfEhLXhtr VklWR1pVCwQmRRlk cX5/KnNycAJDf3Y+ bE5rWD5SCkwpckB5 QFNVQ2kCeGZhPWUC WRZfcx5UcAFPdx8U a1N6AHBDAzANdhEy HhM4ODE3eDlSNhEd aAUKJlFaWkcZE3Y9 QRsYEDw0EAUCXz00 NB06K1kaHV0NKRd6 KV8sUEkVexQWBwRE G1AvSCNUKVgHSmI0 DQpGFV8ZDXVbTCpQ ShEvJBIAHjsaWyxT HkZMUBxHASdCWyoA UzdPX2UxCxAgb1k2 OzgeOklhPjd6AxNL AVUSS09AJEA1PwhP KiNV X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1024:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 75.119.251.161/587 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Block size increase oppositionists: please clearly define what you need done to increase block size to a static 8MB, and help do it X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:25:33 -0000 --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:15:31PM +0700, Venzen Khaosan wrote: > > Do what's best for Bitcoin and define what needs to get done to > > agree to a simple block size increase to a static 8MB. >=20 > And this then leads back to the core issue: if an 8MB blocksize > excludes many on this list from testnet, then the proposed 8MB blocks > will exclude a lot of mainnet participants (miners) and degrade the > quality of diversity and decentralization. >=20 > How about testing at double the capacity: 2MB? Which of course raises another issue: if that was the plan, then all you can do is double capacity, with no clear way to scaling beyond that. Why bother? --=20 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 00000000000000001599522de3e8ed28f0189ddccfa1d6db5eb380cacffc79d7 --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGrBAEBCACVBQJVksLzXhSAAAAAABUAQGJsb2NraGFzaEBiaXRjb2luLm9yZzAw MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAxNTk5NTIyZGUzZThlZDI4ZjAxODlkZGNjZmExZDZkYjVl YjM4MGNhY2ZmYzc5ZDcvFIAAAAAAFQARcGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3JncGV0 ZUBwZXRlcnRvZC5vcmcACgkQJIFAPaXwkftcjQf+MY67fBkATYmd9/5FT2/y2bPr Nztijy6GTuOyzo9GDdGmKfweQxYZ17hx6HDrep9jOb7d38LEEeAVC5AQGeA05PDQ 2/SmdWPkwKsqNOkbGEZALrePOhCdMchYJLcMRC1bkO0FOHqrBGGiCkXC5kVELFoF gwfIFpBbg+d4EEYRti2V4+T3+Ael/j+jc8tX6fODtDHubyyQUtuEg2Chtt+lTM/I bFHopgUGfJzXpsbuUZD2pgBt4hmxPtBgtVSj3T7Zt05ybZH2+X24Fm+8RYeFbb8U f3sjLqqEgPBkuHOcIGXOB09Pf+wXnMrHWRdQGXlM8p9ae2Lrsbx9x7KyPpfBFQ== =X6Rm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA--