1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
|
Return-Path: <nbvfour@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DAA26C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 8 Jan 2017 01:58:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-oi0-f43.google.com (mail-oi0-f43.google.com
[209.85.218.43])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35744135
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 8 Jan 2017 01:58:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oi0-f43.google.com with SMTP id 128so461947523oig.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 07 Jan 2017 17:58:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:cc;
bh=5B5rmdmQPRJzKMY87/u4zxbbcFV4GhAE2CbTjfq0iQk=;
b=L2OkmBzAZ2gc5HDLHNROSenH1VF8OPFRJsWj+wdvpZK8PsCO96R+jCawELHzZdesgm
dSoqH8DhRdmexJ/kFsOqzUHgQlLpYTaPw406lP6lsRFRGQXJuIu3t2dTe2U6JvlqCP+V
zZ7AAe37sWQ3kXMvqU7tCv1ADqhVk+DheL935cMplkSAB2Y1vwNX+bBnusEIM8hqewu1
OIDVvOQU42dYCJcptY8kFkXEKpuaK0C4oyf++rPEo5E5wiAWp014K7/F9hFluesDg1bW
qPa56UJWMARB8WIDcIJTdoxD3VgG7S7N8qOfRe48Rx0F6FZBsbVkL7bYoWtq35ixnMAI
Mi2A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
:date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=5B5rmdmQPRJzKMY87/u4zxbbcFV4GhAE2CbTjfq0iQk=;
b=c+d8lZoxDsTlhCohIus7ExWGKXxPpwD5V3+nF6AZdqsyjXFs/1lbm/WNYseNkeHzol
khIO6QEd/poNFeoxD/vQGaJvK60olJI+Sof/DRx//AE8Txo2pr2TUb+EYKEBz0qs6LbK
FzExzmUzi3lTOVznG0Rc+yDRGQXgzSKXgYKvP2KRqdm7ue1kM6R/1+eRB42SEwMkGvUg
F/1oP652lWMcYKgh6FvG3s9ZnCv40scYzF2h9xisDcrpTE+tX3xUvv5QQ4vDATpbEVc+
LYMr7vZYue/XXnZr+Z+O46dWmGP0vTA8H1tn0Fex2rmX9rM2ktplj+xw91CUE43Kgmux
dvuw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKIcqMWdnUIt0mpwZiNY5JFnh8LqVIK0ADCW9ZD+FnPd8FGcHbgePJ7p0KXLuI+LWNrbLuPtbpr48bpoA==
X-Received: by 10.157.4.53 with SMTP id 50mr4121491otc.234.1483840708467; Sat,
07 Jan 2017 17:58:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: nbvfour@gmail.com
Received: by 10.182.167.97 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 17:58:27 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABr1YTfRDUQNivebMvsONV0na7j_sEyw3gii+5r4v8txu+O68w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7169224.bI6Cz5OEL8@cherry>
<CABr1YTfc0BZ21-mwMohqo8_v8D1QnYiGB_SMeCLwFChY2MV_zA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAcC9ysBJcSyMoTAuyFL+1D4m=-LZOgQF_pb4AFC5vpv-yMAHQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFVRnyqw2w1rHN=ShLBsadB3henEM9BZxxdXj+4QY6NQAyZ4Fg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAcC9ysNPC1nHumY4giCi7ffVRviNZBNfoLdS0UsghSX8NRcmw@mail.gmail.com>
<dd5072fe-be5b-52a6-7171-ed320c851f6f@gmail.com>
<c582369c-5463-611b-1c32-6348bdfb4a9e@voskuil.org>
<CABr1YTfRDUQNivebMvsONV0na7j_sEyw3gii+5r4v8txu+O68w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Chris Priest <cp368202@ohiou.edu>
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 17:58:27 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: jBtXjpMSBdih9EClqVfLRhxJa0Q
Message-ID: <CAAcC9ysOn0CkEO53NnQPnvVJ-PzCmrHYRqYcdZBqBfDbYnv5Vw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Classic 1.2.0 released
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2017 01:58:29 -0000
Its too bad you're not the one who decides what gets posted here or
not. If you don't like whats being discussed, then don't open those
emails.
On 1/7/17, Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Can you guys please take this discussion elsewhere? Perhaps to
> bitcoin-discuss? This is not the place to rehash discussions that have
> taken place a million times already. The behavior of the network under
> contentious hard forks has been discussed ad nauseum. This mailing list is
> for the discussion of new ideas and proposals.
>
> Much appreciated. Thanks.
>
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> On 01/07/2017 03:10 PM, Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>> > Still wondering why you guys don't care about the ridiculous number of
>> > full nodes, no incentive to run one and what would happen if someone
>> > were to control a majority of full nodes
>>
>> The level of control over a majority of full nodes is irrelevant. If
>> this was truly a measure of control over Bitcoin someone would simply
>> spin up a bunch of nodes and take control at trivial cost.
>>
>> e
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>
>>
>
|
