MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: nbvfour@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CABr1YTfRDUQNivebMvsONV0na7j_sEyw3gii+5r4v8txu+O68w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7169224.bI6Cz5OEL8@cherry>
	<CABr1YTfc0BZ21-mwMohqo8_v8D1QnYiGB_SMeCLwFChY2MV_zA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAcC9ysBJcSyMoTAuyFL+1D4m=-LZOgQF_pb4AFC5vpv-yMAHQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFVRnyqw2w1rHN=ShLBsadB3henEM9BZxxdXj+4QY6NQAyZ4Fg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAcC9ysNPC1nHumY4giCi7ffVRviNZBNfoLdS0UsghSX8NRcmw@mail.gmail.com>
	<dd5072fe-be5b-52a6-7171-ed320c851f6f@gmail.com>
	<c582369c-5463-611b-1c32-6348bdfb4a9e@voskuil.org>
	<CABr1YTfRDUQNivebMvsONV0na7j_sEyw3gii+5r4v8txu+O68w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Chris Priest <cp368202@ohiou.edu>
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 17:58:27 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAcC9ysOn0CkEO53NnQPnvVJ-PzCmrHYRqYcdZBqBfDbYnv5Vw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com>, 
	Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Classic 1.2.0 released
Precedence: list

Its too bad you're not the one who decides what gets posted here or
not. If you don't like whats being discussed, then don't open those
emails.

On 1/7/17, Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Can you guys please take this discussion elsewhere? Perhaps to
> bitcoin-discuss? This is not the place to rehash discussions that have
> taken place a million times already. The behavior of the network under
> contentious hard forks has been discussed ad nauseum. This mailing list is
> for the discussion of new ideas and proposals.
>
> Much appreciated. Thanks.
>
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> On 01/07/2017 03:10 PM, Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>> > Still wondering why you guys don't care about the ridiculous number of
>> > full nodes, no incentive to run one and what would happen if someone
>> > were to control a majority of full nodes
>>
>> The level of control over a majority of full nodes is irrelevant. If
>> this was truly a measure of control over Bitcoin someone would simply
>> spin up a bunch of nodes and take control at trivial cost.
>>
>> e
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>
>>
>