1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B5E9108A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 24 Jan 2018 07:45:00 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail149095.authsmtp.com (outmail149095.authsmtp.com
[62.13.149.95])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6E45134
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 24 Jan 2018 07:44:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c245.authsmtp.com (mail-c245.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.245])
by punt22.authsmtp.com. (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w0O7ivkD077130;
Wed, 24 Jan 2018 07:44:57 GMT (envelope-from pete@petertodd.org)
Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com
[52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w0O7itKl086720
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
Wed, 24 Jan 2018 07:44:56 GMT (envelope-from pete@petertodd.org)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C6D6A4010A;
Wed, 24 Jan 2018 07:44:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 88D12209B1; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 02:44:53 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 02:44:53 -0500
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <20180124074453.GC12767@savin.petertodd.org>
References: <M8yPGuNmrXfNNwrYDDLpTVb__BhGysVW060Cq_tMc-AC6F7pKd1Vvb4wWbpmhhEvfoQ7fn-EcgfxRwJSVkFAZ5x57hg9XxpdZlDPi2IBJZg=@protonmail.com>
<20180122200023.GA1055@savin.petertodd.org>
<7yyS0mCgC8UWMYR_Jf1hB_GkkGj6Iu8tnIO7TeXWWyCrg9j4RZ7ziprCPZcv2xsFZdUzcFuHyeMU2-RBujzlSXdUAWlqdricuL2abaX0PWE=@protonmail.com>
<CACiOHGw=XUe6Fxmh8JkNPZWK1d3hWaaVPsNy1dPNoU1qULckrA@mail.gmail.com>
<oY5fxEk2FEJwHTtN9hKit2Unfu9C6CpSKLOVr0Tu99W_ctym_TNtEPLjgSg77e_RePgWHLBF7sNZoXa11aDgm6ClDxT33Jz2M-q3HZC1n40=@protonmail.com>
<CAAS2fgQBMSOhDBUZ6d9cG7fHg4tRr8o+E0j3ZXhdHkxv4kTwUA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WplhKdTI2c8ulnbP"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgQBMSOhDBUZ6d9cG7fHg4tRr8o+E0j3ZXhdHkxv4kTwUA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Server-Quench: 78fd0d03-00da-11e8-9f3b-9cb654bb2504
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aQdMdAYUElQaAgsB Am4bW1NeVFl7XGU7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq
T0pMXVMcUwUXBkVF fUIeWh91dQUIeX5x YEQsWXgNCEQudUVg
Qk4ARHAHZDJodWlJ UxJFflAGdgZOLE1H b1B7GhFYa3VsNCMk
FAgyOXU9MCtqYBhP SwcWJFkOQEENVhsx XR8DGzpnXUcEX3xp
clQ8J1oVDE8NM0I0 cDMA
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1039:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Transaction Merging (bip125 relaxation)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 07:45:00 -0000
--WplhKdTI2c8ulnbP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:49:34PM +0000, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev w=
rote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:19 PM, Rhavar via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > Interesting. I didn't think about this before, but it seems like bip125=
is
> > rather incentive incompatible right now? If we're assuming a competitive
> > mempool, it really doesn't seem generally rational to accept a replacem=
ent
> > transaction of a lower fee rate.
>=20
> BIP125 replacement requires that the fee rate increases. The text of
> the BIP document is written in a confusing way that doesn't make this
> clear.
In fact I considered only requiring an increase in fee rate, based on the
theory that if absolute fee went down, the transaction must be smaller and =
thus
miners could overall earn more from the additional transactions they could =
fit
into their block. But to do that properly requires considering whether or n=
ot
that's actually true in the particular state the mempool as a whole happens=
to
be in, so I ditched that idea early on for the much simpler criteria of bot=
h a
feerate and absolute fee increase.
--=20
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
--WplhKdTI2c8ulnbP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJaaDlwAAoJECSBQD2l8JH7pv0H/3vXj49i5JQ5AVDsnjAmnkiC
wtBOrQVg2o4ZXdXansOCu8ZwfR+Dk+5cPj8Q4rpEiwcoWP+Zx76WYF1iPq5wzgoU
wCa1f2vDOzbUryPWy7bL21HAWpUbNe6eSi1YlXVq9I2Nne0n0u68vKsiBVoucnSi
MnOiCwiuwrw+G44JqlyI78LEkJEuOU/MrJB4Gki9iribMBbae5RGaEYX0lBrINDv
YFjlU3Xq8kvRik4gb+CWrZ23x/gI0B8abYlbcAXnfym6P/MBzpS0kNTyw2QbVRZh
nkOZJgFpD1W/r0w91ZjJUSFnDGFtHT64/F/Oypf1ER+z1jy/wBVj+JGRWyhKkEQ=
=F4Sj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--WplhKdTI2c8ulnbP--
|
