summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/83/33fee57f85ee1f711408408b66e619336c18cd
blob: 5315f4a241aae53f33cd0c2a1e830c20b14607d6 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
Return-Path: <lists@achow101.com>
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72096C0032
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Tue, 10 Oct 2023 22:28:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE47141DD2
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Tue, 10 Oct 2023 22:28:54 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org AE47141DD2
Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key,
 unprotected) header.d=achow101.com header.i=@achow101.com header.a=rsa-sha256
 header.s=protonmail2 header.b=c6rhcOWV
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.8
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7,
 SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id hGVlUrFbJAFJ
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Tue, 10 Oct 2023 22:28:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-0301.mail-europe.com (mail-0301.mail-europe.com
 [188.165.51.139])
 by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC46E417EC
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Tue, 10 Oct 2023 22:28:52 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org CC46E417EC
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=achow101.com;
 s=protonmail2; t=1696976925; x=1697236125;
 bh=ppHVKhVbT0JGQA1l4kGrqZ4i+zE3mm3UBAy5FU77k8E=;
 h=Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:
 Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector;
 b=c6rhcOWVFm9FoMlcplBLqld+Knr1yBqZmNsU74+DdtQ+FFAzUfQn8ZRDW/WmCyZ7q
 EmY5X1NkdwxJ2UNFYurlkaQjYtFpMpKyGqZYFHiTHmTtWHg98rUXezSt59mGHDsaSv
 otbwb0850JaX8KFciCJEfUfiHLTPZnTcsc381ZJE/XwbIkirEOS00XDvWGiLEbLRwo
 QyoH8ygGm18V8kcN9nk7lWs2IYc4op2kzVo5TBN0qLMze9rrLhdI5xWBFaD+n2vnCl
 2AVrSDLchqfwb/7auDJcpQ+fn2Y5UnTVjaov+9Ge1yFBXjhKG+E+fy7bYjAJ9FihUn
 hTxmVTwU4VwLA==
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 22:28:37 +0000
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
From: Andrew Chow <lists@achow101.com>
Message-ID: <c3aad7de-ec6d-407a-b33e-b52663523ef7@achow101.com>
Feedback-ID: 53660394:user:proton
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 13:04:28 +0000
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP for MuSig2 PSBT Fields
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 22:28:55 -0000

Hi All,

I've written up a BIP draft for MuSig2 PSBT fields. It can be viewed at=20
https://github.com/achow101/bips/blob/musig2-psbt/bip-musig2-psbt.mediawiki=
.

This is based on this gist from Sanket:=20
https://gist.github.com/sanket1729/4b525c6049f4d9e034d27368c49f28a6.=20
There are a few notable differences:
- The participant pubkeys field is keyed by only the aggregate xonly key
- Participant pubkeys are compressed pubkeys rather than xonly.

Andrew