Return-Path: Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72096C0032 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 22:28:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE47141DD2 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 22:28:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org AE47141DD2 Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=achow101.com header.i=@achow101.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=protonmail2 header.b=c6rhcOWV X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.8 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hGVlUrFbJAFJ for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 22:28:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-0301.mail-europe.com (mail-0301.mail-europe.com [188.165.51.139]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC46E417EC for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 22:28:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org CC46E417EC DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=achow101.com; s=protonmail2; t=1696976925; x=1697236125; bh=ppHVKhVbT0JGQA1l4kGrqZ4i+zE3mm3UBAy5FU77k8E=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date: Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=c6rhcOWVFm9FoMlcplBLqld+Knr1yBqZmNsU74+DdtQ+FFAzUfQn8ZRDW/WmCyZ7q EmY5X1NkdwxJ2UNFYurlkaQjYtFpMpKyGqZYFHiTHmTtWHg98rUXezSt59mGHDsaSv otbwb0850JaX8KFciCJEfUfiHLTPZnTcsc381ZJE/XwbIkirEOS00XDvWGiLEbLRwo QyoH8ygGm18V8kcN9nk7lWs2IYc4op2kzVo5TBN0qLMze9rrLhdI5xWBFaD+n2vnCl 2AVrSDLchqfwb/7auDJcpQ+fn2Y5UnTVjaov+9Ge1yFBXjhKG+E+fy7bYjAJ9FihUn hTxmVTwU4VwLA== Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 22:28:37 +0000 To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion From: Andrew Chow Message-ID: Feedback-ID: 53660394:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 13:04:28 +0000 Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP for MuSig2 PSBT Fields X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 22:28:55 -0000 Hi All, I've written up a BIP draft for MuSig2 PSBT fields. It can be viewed at=20 https://github.com/achow101/bips/blob/musig2-psbt/bip-musig2-psbt.mediawiki= . This is based on this gist from Sanket:=20 https://gist.github.com/sanket1729/4b525c6049f4d9e034d27368c49f28a6.=20 There are a few notable differences: - The participant pubkeys field is keyed by only the aggregate xonly key - Participant pubkeys are compressed pubkeys rather than xonly. Andrew