1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
|
Return-Path: <tamas.blummer@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBCF31388
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 6 Feb 2019 19:48:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-vk1-f169.google.com (mail-vk1-f169.google.com
[209.85.221.169])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF9B41FB
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 6 Feb 2019 19:48:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vk1-f169.google.com with SMTP id f206so1315257vke.6
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 06 Feb 2019 11:48:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=+IZ9TTiTtQwhxgfqnOQoTMRsW80w5SYTA2Yh0Zee6nw=;
b=CtjbVQrEb33UA+vxXNYU17wIpNerMqOSq7EjZIyYE79l33SWbverGNoeD5DEp96MoV
p0pJU7G8RDGvQr1YmQ5mDoJdsfxjnJe4E744MitusfEy6MiXmX0Vr3Mau2Uj/RdT0VF5
oC32vAKR9jPsTJaxD3MEoDW9qptVCIXWV66feQusmf/QqbuDj/N+AGERNRQSAieJokIi
Wil2Ci3cCi/RaNWa4UwtATo62RF91Df9QaehbJHH1D1TkF8hdUxgQVVI0MfO9hKv1MhH
QF8BgFjQWN3ex67gGHiVe5uPNvdEnQ11ooJu40kdeMRNfeXug9/JtCNYBTkUwfw58Xod
djNA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=+IZ9TTiTtQwhxgfqnOQoTMRsW80w5SYTA2Yh0Zee6nw=;
b=CIkRioQzulJL0FQRKUKYXxShVuDRy7yeYRQJ9zbtboV7vDsp98eyvnZWMLAIkTjUoY
49cOcdbkMzTFcq76STNm9T40Tw2edvthzZvQWyDGHaNQegq2zhtOI/jtVSBTuJA0wFTn
QLIoFqz1+gw7wrHIvT6hY441Kr3lHCTvZfuF9r0K4Wuf21E9j8xcnzV5Rer+5EKjDRsr
zun0ilHof8vGkaDwrj0e6tPl9Q0NjjUM2sE0XHg4Oc146NbG4Hr+b9ARjXs5jAE28SkE
Zswb6lBr0+v+vt+MNrEv4S5o3zF+Ub0S8zeCTS8MBy7sGWug5fQi2O/ZNltMzOXlsoe0
7ACw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuahvfQPBdkXgd7xotP5VGTc6qvkMOYLfMsUb0dKzRaf65XqUkqO
JVq0jcWgK6q9GMRpZPRjJWH6hfSMj/MPlqnnrXY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IbskC/qe84VtnnYuZAe/I7epqGruI7xZDi7+SBPbWxsZouRPAPea/Qthr14b4Xe/4q4A/yI+f4rLAd4ZnrzO30=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:19d6:: with SMTP id 205mr4777746vkz.53.1549482503705;
Wed, 06 Feb 2019 11:48:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <6D57649F-0236-4FBA-8376-4815F5F39E8A@gmail.com>
<CADZtCSgKu1LvjePNPT=0C0UYQvb47Ca0YN+B_AfgVNTpcOno4w@mail.gmail.com>
<CDAFC2F7-A0AD-460B-B5B1-A717F7EC700E@gmail.com>
<CAO3Pvs_gvYy99Bch=7RwVszM_0PFTKUyqDVok=xfm4OOcqwaaQ@mail.gmail.com>
<6D36035C-A675-4845-9292-3BC16CD19B41@gmail.com>
<CAO3Pvs_Ai9d_uHC2a3ndGXhBoV-PDp2y_NShkbn=hRuzu=wNFw@mail.gmail.com>
<5A850549-B6C9-4590-BA9B-0D69BBE531F9@gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgRY-EaPMORjipJuysi-z61VUMivOKmSeO1Rv7vXOPeLKQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgRY-EaPMORjipJuysi-z61VUMivOKmSeO1Rv7vXOPeLKQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tamas Blummer <tamas.blummer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 19:48:09 +0000
Message-ID: <CAGc5dgbm0wQKs4bAyN8bPdqq=RbS--TvcvUOmX2_rMTCx0POAg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000381eac05813f0274"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 20:16:52 +0000
Cc: Jim Posen <jimpo@coinbase.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Interrogating a BIP157 server,
BIP158 change proposal
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 19:48:25 -0000
--000000000000381eac05813f0274
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
I do not think this ad hominem attack of you on me was justified.
I wrote code, gathered and shared data now and back in 2018. I showed
understanding of non technical issues. Is there an actual action that
defies my observation that a commitment is not yet in sight?
Is there anything technically wrong in what I wrote?
If not you should stop.
Tamas Blummer
On Wed, 6 Feb 2019, 18:17 Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 8:10 AM Tamas Blummer <tamas.blummer@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I am skeptical that commitment of any filter will come into Core soon.
> [...] A committed filter makes light clients much more reliable and
> attractive, for some taste too much more.
>
> You keep repeating this smear. Please stop.
>
> If you would actually bother reading the threads where this was
> discussed previously you will see that there was significant interest
> from bitcoin developers to eventually commit an output filter, and a
> significant investment of effort in improving the proposal to that
> end. It is really disheartening to see you continue to repeat your
> negative assumptions about other people's wishes when you haven't even
> invested the time required to read their words.
>
--000000000000381eac05813f0274
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"auto">I do not think this ad hominem attack of you on me was ju=
stified.<div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">I wrote code, gathere=
d and shared data now and back in 2018. I showed understanding of non techn=
ical issues. Is there an actual action that defies my observation that a co=
mmitment is not yet in sight?</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"=
auto">Is there anything technically wrong in what I wrote?=C2=A0</div><div =
dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">If not you should stop.</div><div =
dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Tamas Blummer</div><br><br><div cl=
ass=3D"gmail_quote" dir=3D"auto"><div dir=3D"ltr">On Wed, 6 Feb 2019, 18:17=
Gregory Maxwell <<a href=3D"mailto:greg@xiph.org">greg@xiph.org</a> wro=
te:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;b=
order-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 8:10 AM =
Tamas Blummer <<a href=3D"mailto:tamas.blummer@gmail.com" target=3D"_bla=
nk" rel=3D"noreferrer">tamas.blummer@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> I am skeptical that commitment of any filter will come into Core soon.=
[...] A committed filter makes light clients much more reliable and attrac=
tive, for some taste too much more.<br>
<br>
You keep repeating this smear. Please stop.<br>
<br>
If you would actually bother reading the threads where this was<br>
discussed previously you will see that there was significant interest<br>
from bitcoin developers to eventually commit an output filter, and a<br>
significant investment of effort in improving the proposal to that<br>
end.=C2=A0 It is really disheartening to see you continue to repeat your<br=
>
negative assumptions about other people's wishes when you haven't e=
ven<br>
invested the time required to read their words.<br>
</blockquote></div></div>
--000000000000381eac05813f0274--
|
