Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBCF31388 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 19:48:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-vk1-f169.google.com (mail-vk1-f169.google.com [209.85.221.169]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF9B41FB for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 19:48:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk1-f169.google.com with SMTP id f206so1315257vke.6 for ; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 11:48:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+IZ9TTiTtQwhxgfqnOQoTMRsW80w5SYTA2Yh0Zee6nw=; b=CtjbVQrEb33UA+vxXNYU17wIpNerMqOSq7EjZIyYE79l33SWbverGNoeD5DEp96MoV p0pJU7G8RDGvQr1YmQ5mDoJdsfxjnJe4E744MitusfEy6MiXmX0Vr3Mau2Uj/RdT0VF5 oC32vAKR9jPsTJaxD3MEoDW9qptVCIXWV66feQusmf/QqbuDj/N+AGERNRQSAieJokIi Wil2Ci3cCi/RaNWa4UwtATo62RF91Df9QaehbJHH1D1TkF8hdUxgQVVI0MfO9hKv1MhH QF8BgFjQWN3ex67gGHiVe5uPNvdEnQ11ooJu40kdeMRNfeXug9/JtCNYBTkUwfw58Xod djNA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+IZ9TTiTtQwhxgfqnOQoTMRsW80w5SYTA2Yh0Zee6nw=; b=CIkRioQzulJL0FQRKUKYXxShVuDRy7yeYRQJ9zbtboV7vDsp98eyvnZWMLAIkTjUoY 49cOcdbkMzTFcq76STNm9T40Tw2edvthzZvQWyDGHaNQegq2zhtOI/jtVSBTuJA0wFTn QLIoFqz1+gw7wrHIvT6hY441Kr3lHCTvZfuF9r0K4Wuf21E9j8xcnzV5Rer+5EKjDRsr zun0ilHof8vGkaDwrj0e6tPl9Q0NjjUM2sE0XHg4Oc146NbG4Hr+b9ARjXs5jAE28SkE Zswb6lBr0+v+vt+MNrEv4S5o3zF+Ub0S8zeCTS8MBy7sGWug5fQi2O/ZNltMzOXlsoe0 7ACw== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuahvfQPBdkXgd7xotP5VGTc6qvkMOYLfMsUb0dKzRaf65XqUkqO JVq0jcWgK6q9GMRpZPRjJWH6hfSMj/MPlqnnrXY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IbskC/qe84VtnnYuZAe/I7epqGruI7xZDi7+SBPbWxsZouRPAPea/Qthr14b4Xe/4q4A/yI+f4rLAd4ZnrzO30= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:19d6:: with SMTP id 205mr4777746vkz.53.1549482503705; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 11:48:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6D57649F-0236-4FBA-8376-4815F5F39E8A@gmail.com> <6D36035C-A675-4845-9292-3BC16CD19B41@gmail.com> <5A850549-B6C9-4590-BA9B-0D69BBE531F9@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Tamas Blummer Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 19:48:09 +0000 Message-ID: To: Gregory Maxwell Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000381eac05813f0274" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 20:16:52 +0000 Cc: Jim Posen , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Interrogating a BIP157 server, BIP158 change proposal X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 19:48:25 -0000 --000000000000381eac05813f0274 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I do not think this ad hominem attack of you on me was justified. I wrote code, gathered and shared data now and back in 2018. I showed understanding of non technical issues. Is there an actual action that defies my observation that a commitment is not yet in sight? Is there anything technically wrong in what I wrote? If not you should stop. Tamas Blummer On Wed, 6 Feb 2019, 18:17 Gregory Maxwell On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 8:10 AM Tamas Blummer > wrote: > > I am skeptical that commitment of any filter will come into Core soon. > [...] A committed filter makes light clients much more reliable and > attractive, for some taste too much more. > > You keep repeating this smear. Please stop. > > If you would actually bother reading the threads where this was > discussed previously you will see that there was significant interest > from bitcoin developers to eventually commit an output filter, and a > significant investment of effort in improving the proposal to that > end. It is really disheartening to see you continue to repeat your > negative assumptions about other people's wishes when you haven't even > invested the time required to read their words. > --000000000000381eac05813f0274 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I do not think this ad hominem attack of you on me was ju= stified.

I wrote code, gathere= d and shared data now and back in 2018. I showed understanding of non techn= ical issues. Is there an actual action that defies my observation that a co= mmitment is not yet in sight?

Is there anything technically wrong in what I wrote?=C2=A0

If not you should stop.

Tamas Blummer


On Wed, 6 Feb 2019, 18:17= Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org wro= te:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 8:10 AM = Tamas Blummer <tamas.blummer@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am skeptical that commitment of any filter will come into Core soon.= [...] A committed filter makes light clients much more reliable and attrac= tive, for some taste too much more.

You keep repeating this smear. Please stop.

If you would actually bother reading the threads where this was
discussed previously you will see that there was significant interest
from bitcoin developers to eventually commit an output filter, and a
significant investment of effort in improving the proposal to that
end.=C2=A0 It is really disheartening to see you continue to repeat your negative assumptions about other people's wishes when you haven't e= ven
invested the time required to read their words.
--000000000000381eac05813f0274--