1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
|
Return-Path: <earonesty@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 071CDC0001
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 4 Mar 2021 03:26:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA0046E8F5
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 4 Mar 2021 03:26:35 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.352
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.352 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_12_24=1.049, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249,
FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=q32-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id f8OSEYOMlOh9
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 4 Mar 2021 03:26:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 07:57:40 by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail-pg1-x52e.google.com (mail-pg1-x52e.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52e])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 719EE606CB
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 4 Mar 2021 03:26:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id e6so17960873pgk.5
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 03 Mar 2021 19:26:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=q32-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=jqzIcTjN8d0aU7U3H9J8e9zK0rGZnDzr77thB5l1zcE=;
b=q34ho65zlbL+Cu1LiZfjzhwvDeVYrhUhEs8zLr2vXEpDUQmL1PPrd9zkkfannymCVN
UVjTlUISnHN1GGOCbofsLbpfAocB5Nd2ThQd3aHxUmcW96a3myMtyka4AiswEpoNuXVn
r+rsRpFqypWf77jQkOXUiRBDpKRL9nB0/jdKx0VS0Sj3336vHLZVcR+OXOZY1PU6vH1E
SSA+zSYsZFySNYTpRZ9nqXPYUdL6XPrdmjN/MdCRiWU0IL7htiCR+y6WQpCQNxXaI6ms
fbFMHZQW748/He1z5VgWu9WvVmXMXwHpvEbw51QG6pLNK9/6IzlHrEfCx3dPiGCzJq2E
HNgg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=jqzIcTjN8d0aU7U3H9J8e9zK0rGZnDzr77thB5l1zcE=;
b=AmErQ6pxjEIrmugiJgqYc1OWwFVar1B3eg9XIQRvpoPIwZ6SH59vmrHjGcWtFjrLw5
RVOPlf74+Q59evG8r/J4ahGhwpYcwokkwWmmX6HTaQDlHN95Jya8lLGmkOB4Sk6V7p19
t3jivPUkY2fP61B/ZpEItFVdfC+ml7pQYyMaw6WcGbTGwAjFzQUrlxzxPv31x8Ys1e5o
gEesmZ1ricZxTiDgKnfpRjfCOPD8/GfrAHmgfyNcXmwhMY4/f09rDEKMbVga8pcuKQeH
pA/vAyKDiHFS59tkgOn4Q13rJkj9yRym8DqUdnI4RqNJR38T7XbTUwfiGy/nvcH5y8Lm
1eKw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531FLC6JDsXsjMsekbhZDZ7XK2lyYYgqP5SwB4pOjuT7wbXUZ+5l
ytG7DUCWY3hvau/oyRgukxb1lPk1ckza+ShbmUDY48mUBe0w
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyYO6qV+CixvSX9kJ+8UU4XDj6vZdoCl5sP/xrlA0H/5yNUnx7e6tIEdOmxqOlLjCh1SGl7j0Bv6/pv9rt+s4s=
X-Received: by 2002:a63:c0a:: with SMTP id b10mr23972805pgl.251.1614782959980;
Wed, 03 Mar 2021 06:49:19 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <SL2P216MB0089B70AEDD58F2EBC46B4309D9A9@SL2P216MB0089.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
<A326C6D2-7C6E-42A2-93C9-DC7647BB09B6@voskuil.org>
<fbc4ce6c-111d-4dcc-8fc7-03ea91855bc4@www.fastmail.com>
<SL2P216MB00899B7B3C67C0DD9E9376B09D989@SL2P216MB0089.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <SL2P216MB00899B7B3C67C0DD9E9376B09D989@SL2P216MB0089.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
From: Erik Aronesty <erik@q32.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 09:49:08 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJowKg+UY4AN_9otk+6doNsP6NVeHZti_89rCAOTfVaQahre+A@mail.gmail.com>
To: LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH <willtech@live.com.au>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 20:48:42 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot NACK
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 03:26:36 -0000
taproot does not enable anything that cannot already be done today.
it only enables larger and more complex scripts to be done more
efficiently - using less ledger space.
so any objections you can have should be leveled at bitcoin, not at taproot=
.
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 6:39 AM LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH via
bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> "Today I spent approximately $5 at a chip shop in North London in cash. B=
esides the fact that I have voluntarily chosen to share this information, i=
t is absolutely no concern of yourself or any other party that this transac=
tion has occured."
>
> Good Afternoon,
>
> Requiring little argument I concur, privacy allows that you do not have s=
noops and researchers following you around looking in your purse as you tra=
nsact. For the general public, how much you carry in your purse and where y=
ou get it from is none of their business. However, your employer is require=
d to report to the government a record of pay, or at least maintain that re=
cord, and the store where you made a purchase similarly to keep records so =
that taxes can be paid. From their perspective, you do not need to know how=
much they keep in their drawer. Bitcoin directly allows your purse to be p=
rivate and for the transaction ledger to take the scrutiny anyone should be=
able to apply to prove the ledger is honest. Maintaining an argument that =
consensus requires the ledger to be honest does not prove that it is honest=
.
>
> KING JAMES HRMH
> Great British Empire
>
> Regards,
> The Australian
> LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH (& HMRH)
> of Hougun Manor & Glencoe & British Empire
> MR. Damian A. James Williamson
> Wills
>
> et al.
>
>
> Willtech
> www.willtech.com.au
> www.go-overt.com
> and other projects
>
> earn.com/willtech
> linkedin.com/in/damianwilliamson
>
>
> m. 0487135719
> f. +61261470192
>
>
> This email does not constitute a general advice. Please disregard this em=
ail if misdelivered.
> ________________________________
> From: bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org> on beha=
lf of Daniel Edgecumbe via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.o=
rg>
> Sent: Tuesday, 2 March 2021 12:16 PM
> To: M.K. Safi via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
> Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot NACK
>
> Any "transparency" in the blockchain, beyond that required for a particip=
ant to determine valid ownership, can only reasonably be thought of as a bu=
g.
>
> Today I spent approximately $5 at a chip shop in North London in cash. Be=
sides the fact that I have voluntarily chosen to share this information, it=
is absolutely no concern of yourself or any other party that this transact=
ion has occured.
>
> Bitcoin is digital cash.
>
> Daniel Edgecumbe | esotericnonsense
> email@esotericnonsense.com | https://esotericnonsense.com
>
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2021, at 22:37, Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > To be clear, is this a NACK because Taproot reduces =E2=80=9Ctransparen=
cy=E2=80=9D
> > (increases privacy) on the chain (=E2=80=9Cmaintaining consensus=E2=80=
=9D is obviously
> > an argument against any protocol change, so that=E2=80=99s a red herrin=
g)?
> >
> > And is it your theory that only an =E2=80=9Chonest=E2=80=9D (statute ab=
iding) person
> > should have privacy, and not against the state, and/or that mixers are
> > sufficient privacy?
> >
> > Personally, I=E2=80=99m not moved by such an argument. What do you thin=
k is the
> > value proposition of Bitcoin?
> >
> > e
> >
> > > On Mar 1, 2021, at 14:21, LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH via bitcoin-=
dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > =EF=BB=BF
> > > Good Afternoon,
> > >
> > > I am going to take tough terms with much of your reply and do appreci=
ate a courteous practice. Having previously made public disclosure of my af=
filiation with Jambler.io it seems sufficient to disclose my affiliation th=
rough the link in my email signature block.
> > >
> > > My concern is not increased privacy it is maintaining consensus value=
s and the transparency of the blockchain wherein all transactions are publi=
shed in an immutable record and that forbids the redaction of information b=
y any obfuscation. A separate concern is the availability of a privacy suit=
able for cash should a Bitcoin user desire and especially without disturbin=
g the existing consensus.
> > >
> > > The use of a Bitcoin Mixer is to enable standard equivalent privacy. =
As you may experience yourself, you do not allow people to follow you aroun=
d looking in your purse, suppose you are dealing entirely with cash, and to=
see where and how much you fill it up, and where you spend. Nonetheless, f=
or an honest person, their wallet is available for government audit as are =
their financial affairs. This is consistent with the existing operation of =
consensus.
> > >
> > > My full email signature block is a disclosure where I have some affil=
iation with the referenced website being that it carries at least some info=
rmation that I have provided or that in some way I am associated perhaps on=
ly making use of their services. For example, I hardly make a profit from L=
inkedIn just my information is there. Also, I have made previous public dis=
closure of the affiliation. Bitcoin Mixer 2.0 is a partner mixer run by Jam=
bler.io wherein I receive a service referral fee and am not in receipt of a=
ny part of the process transaction. The operation block diagram provided by=
Jambler.io is provided here and attached.
> > > <ip.bitcointalk.org.png>
> > >
> > > [ip.bitcointalk.org.png]-Operation of Jambler.io partner mixer
> > > https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fjambler.io%2Fimages%2Fs=
cheme-1.png&t=3D622&c=3DgTi7r1cfh-yynw
> > > from this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3D5267588
> > >
> > >
> > > The installation script provided by Jambler.io that is the basis of m=
y referral website is also publicly published,
> > > https://github.com/jambler-io/bitcoin-mixer
> > >
> > > The disclosure for the partner program is available from Jambler.io h=
owever and is made prominently on my referral website. While it may seem lu=
crative at first I insist all partner profits are reportable on your person=
al income.
> > > https://jambler.io/become-partner.php
> > >
> > > I am certainly better than confident that you appreciate the differen=
ce between an open and transparent blockchain and the ability of the user t=
o not reveal details of the content of their wallet publicly.
> > >
> > > If further clarification is required may I suggest you pay a token an=
d mix some Bitcoin wherein our discussion may then have some point of refer=
ence.
> > >
> > > KING JAMES HRMH
> > > Great British Empire
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > The Australian
> > > LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH (& HMRH)
> > > of Hougun Manor & Glencoe & British Empire
> > > MR. Damian A. James Williamson
> > > Wills
> > >
> > > et al.
> > >
> > >
> > > Willtech
> > > www.willtech.com.au
> > > www.go-overt.com
> > > and other projects
> > >
> > > earn.com/willtech
> > > linkedin.com/in/damianwilliamson
> > >
> > >
> > > m. 0487135719
> > > f. +61261470192
> > >
> > >
> > > This email does not constitute a general advice. Please disregard thi=
s email if misdelivered.
> > > *From:* Ariel Lorenzo-Luaces <arielluaces@gmail.com>
> > > *Sent:* Monday, 1 March 2021 12:07 AM
> > > *To:* LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH <willtech@live.com.au>; Bitcoin =
Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
> > > *Subject:* Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot NACK
> > >
> > > Hello LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH
> > >
> > > I find a striking dichotomy between your concern of increased privacy=
in bitcoin and your link to a bitcoin mixer in your signature www.go-overt=
.com
> > >
> > > At first your concerns seemed genuine but after seeing your promotion=
of a bitcoin mixer I'm thinking your concerns may be more profit motivated=
? I can't tell since you failed to disclose your relationship with the mixe=
r.
> > >
> > > Could you please clarify your association with the bitcoin mixer and =
moving forward could you please always do proper disclosure any time you're=
publically talking about bitcoin transaction privacy. It's only fair to do=
so as to not mislead people in an attempt to manipulate at worst and just =
a courteous practice at best.
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Ariel Lorenzo-Luaces
> > > On Feb 28, 2021, at 4:36 AM, LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH via bitco=
in-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >> Good Evening,
> > >>
> > >> Thank-you for your advice @JeremyRubin <https://twitter.com/Jeremy=
Rubin> on the basis you advise, "Taproot does not enable monero-like priva=
cy features", I am prepred to withdraw my NACK notably that the existing fe=
eatures of Bitcoin MUST be maintained, and whereby the UTXO of a transactio=
n is identifiable, the PayTo Address, and the amount all without any obfusc=
ation.
> > >>
> > >> Lightning does not really provide obfuscation, it provides a result =
of a subset of transactions although the operation of the channel is observ=
able to the parties.
> > >>
> > >> The reports I were reading concerning the supposed operation of Tapr=
oot published in a public media channel may have been speculation or misinf=
ormation nonetheless it is prudent to conditionally reply as you see that I=
have. It is important not to allow things to slip through the cracks. As y=
ou may believe may astute reviewers could make a full disclosure to this li=
st it is not to be expected.
> > >>
> > >> KING JAMES HRMH
> > >> Great British Empire
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> The Australian
> > >> LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH (& HMRH)
> > >> of Hougun Manor & Glencoe & British Empire
> > >> MR. Damian A. James Williamson
> > >> Wills
> > >>
> > >> et al.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Willtech
> > >> www.willtech.com.au
> > >> www.go-overt.com
> > >> and other projects
> > >>
> > >> earn.com/willtech
> > >> linkedin.com/in/damianwilliamson
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> m. 0487135719
> > >> f. +61261470192
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> This email does not constitute a general advice. Please disregard th=
is email if misdelivered.
> > >> *From:* Jeremy <jlrubin@mit.edu>
> > >> *Sent:* Sunday, 28 February 2021 3:14 AM
> > >> *To:* LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH <willtech@live.com.au>; Bitcoin=
Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
> > >> *Subject:* Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot NACK
> > >>
> > >> I have good news for you: Taproot does not enable monero-like privac=
y features any moreso than already exist in Bitcoin today. At its core, tap=
root is a way to make transactions with embedded smart contracts less expen=
sive, done so in a manner that may marginally improve privacy dependent on =
user behavior (but not in the monero-like way you mention). For example, it=
makes it possible for lightning channels to look structurally similar to s=
ingle key wallets, but it does nothing inherently to obfuscate the transact=
ion graph as in monero.
> > >>
> > >> Such "monero-like" transaction graph obfuscation may already exist i=
n Bitcoin via other techniques (coinjoin, payjoin, coinswap, lightning, etc=
) with or without Taproot, so the point is further moot.
> > >>
> > >> Do you have a source on your reporting?
> > >>
> > >> You may wish to rescind your nack.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> @JeremyRubin <https://twitter.com/JeremyRubin> <https://twitter.com=
/JeremyRubin>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 5:46 AM LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH via b=
itcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >>> Good Afternoon,
> > >>>
> > >>> It has been reported that Taproot will enable some Monero like feat=
ures including the ability to hide transactions.
> > >>>
> > >>> If that is the case I offer a full NACK and let me explain.
> > >>>
> > >>> A part of the benefit of using Bitcoin is its honesty. The full tra=
nsaction is published on the blockchain. If that were to change so that tra=
nsactions may be obfuscated from scrutiny then any government would have un=
limited impetus to ban Bitcoin, and speculation has that is the reason Indi=
a has been reported to have banned cryptocurrencies already.
> > >>>
> > >>> I am in support of the expanded use case of Bitcoin without harming=
the established robust fairness and equal equity offered. The core functio=
nality of Bitcoin, its values, must remain unaltered.
> > >>>
> > >>> KING JAMES HRMH
> > >>> Great British Empire
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards,
> > >>> The Australian
> > >>> LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH (& HMRH)
> > >>> of Hougun Manor & Glencoe & British Empire
> > >>> MR. Damian A. James Williamson
> > >>> Wills
> > >>>
> > >>> et al.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Willtech
> > >>> www.willtech.com.au
> > >>> www.go-overt.com
> > >>> and other projects
> > >>>
> > >>> earn.com/willtech
> > >>> linkedin.com/in/damianwilliamson
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> m. 0487135719
> > >>> f. +61261470192
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> This email does not constitute a general advice. Please disregard t=
his email if misdelivered.
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> > >>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> > >>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
> > >>
> > >> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> > >> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> > >> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
> > > <ip.bitcointalk.org.png>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > bitcoin-dev mailing list
> > > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> > > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > bitcoin-dev mailing list
> > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
|