1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
|
Return-Path: <marcopon@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B672B154D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 1 Sep 2015 14:52:13 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-lb0-f173.google.com (mail-lb0-f173.google.com
[209.85.217.173])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01BD3239
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 1 Sep 2015 14:52:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lbbmp1 with SMTP id mp1so1174650lbb.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 01 Sep 2015 07:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=1wZjisTZmtfP7wuU5HeR0xed6m65+TFvSEFNBBrqas0=;
b=c65tYjozGZ8ysYGFuw7kI6FS8H3BmwS1WL3C3eqRQFs9IpIIOWZtL34enuBEWRBUjP
2osXn4vD9+cO4wei2VTHgiRpDgb4hrz2gONTLZ/+4BGoOP45bzMDO3qMqY6/7fxeONxs
mwJd7DmZ48ylQAJ6OvuJxmlGdT3pcSRqzX7a9B2LRFFRRAt0ef78sUIKrQfWUbMOD+aM
4VobtQWhGnlSNyjgkJFggHpZcgr1E6VGkIaFkBW+qi4oeY1w962M4oBopWPOPEw25Sfu
u4FM0lwOANOaFK0Ccf55tJkY8AekLDud+U+RG2uYWLCU6hAM/zUyDbtja2aMUNWfed3k
3tjg==
X-Received: by 10.112.63.138 with SMTP id g10mr13532142lbs.106.1441119131489;
Tue, 01 Sep 2015 07:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.114.186.168 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Sep 2015 07:51:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3F757B30-70CA-464F-9879-84C275DB62C7@ricmoo.com>
References: <CAE0pACLMcMzHkA=vEx+fiEmq7FA1bXDc4t_hQ+955=r=62V5=g@mail.gmail.com>
<CF21152C-15FA-421C-B369-A9A7DB59865F@ricmoo.com>
<CADJgMztaJHDrz0+7KLouwZMCz--Za6-2pitmjjYVHG+nJjrG=Q@mail.gmail.com>
<3F757B30-70CA-464F-9879-84C275DB62C7@ricmoo.com>
From: Marco Pontello <marcopon@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 16:51:52 +0200
Message-ID: <CAE0pACJDEHqoLR7=Nyfury-QooLrt_HoaqifE1Ujz_V-2z4_BQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Richard Moore <me@ricmoo.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133d38ae95f77051eb0b185
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: "bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] RFC - BIP: URI scheme for Blockchain exploration
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 14:52:13 -0000
--001a1133d38ae95f77051eb0b185
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 9:28 PM, Richard Moore <me@ricmoo.com> wrote:
> Yes! Good point, network should be encoded. Not sure I like this format
> yet, but what if it was part of the authority, like block:testnet. Like
> http uses port 80 by default, you could have block by default refer to
> block:mainnet.
>
> Eg.
>
> blockchain://tx:testnet3/3b95a766d7a99b87188d6875c8484cb2b310b78459b7816d4dfc3f0f7e04281a
>
> I will read the RFC over more thoroughly tomorrow to get an idea of what
> types of things make more or less sense.
Like this option too!
--
Try the Online TrID File Identifier
http://mark0.net/onlinetrid.aspx
--001a1133d38ae95f77051eb0b185
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On S=
at, Aug 29, 2015 at 9:28 PM, Richard Moore <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D=
"mailto:me@ricmoo.com" target=3D"_blank">me@ricmoo.com</a>></span> wrote=
:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-le=
ft:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Yes! Good point, network should be enco=
ded. Not sure I like this format yet, but what if it was part of the author=
ity, like block:testnet. Like http uses port 80 by default, you could have =
block by default refer to block:mainnet.<br>
<br>
Eg.<br>
blockchain://tx:testnet3/3b95a766d7a99b87188d6875c8484cb2b310b78459b7816d4d=
fc3f0f7e04281a<br>
<br>
I will read the RFC over more thoroughly tomorrow to get an idea of what ty=
pes of things make more or less sense.=C2=A0</blockquote></div><div><br></d=
iv><div>Like this option too!</div><div><br></div><div><br></div>-- <br><di=
v class=3D"gmail_signature">Try the Online TrID File Identifier<br><a href=
=3D"http://mark0.net/onlinetrid.aspx" target=3D"_blank">http://mark0.net/on=
linetrid.aspx</a></div>
</div></div>
--001a1133d38ae95f77051eb0b185--
|
