Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B672B154D for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2015 14:52:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-lb0-f173.google.com (mail-lb0-f173.google.com [209.85.217.173]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01BD3239 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2015 14:52:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbbmp1 with SMTP id mp1so1174650lbb.1 for ; Tue, 01 Sep 2015 07:52:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=1wZjisTZmtfP7wuU5HeR0xed6m65+TFvSEFNBBrqas0=; b=c65tYjozGZ8ysYGFuw7kI6FS8H3BmwS1WL3C3eqRQFs9IpIIOWZtL34enuBEWRBUjP 2osXn4vD9+cO4wei2VTHgiRpDgb4hrz2gONTLZ/+4BGoOP45bzMDO3qMqY6/7fxeONxs mwJd7DmZ48ylQAJ6OvuJxmlGdT3pcSRqzX7a9B2LRFFRRAt0ef78sUIKrQfWUbMOD+aM 4VobtQWhGnlSNyjgkJFggHpZcgr1E6VGkIaFkBW+qi4oeY1w962M4oBopWPOPEw25Sfu u4FM0lwOANOaFK0Ccf55tJkY8AekLDud+U+RG2uYWLCU6hAM/zUyDbtja2aMUNWfed3k 3tjg== X-Received: by 10.112.63.138 with SMTP id g10mr13532142lbs.106.1441119131489; Tue, 01 Sep 2015 07:52:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.186.168 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Sep 2015 07:51:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3F757B30-70CA-464F-9879-84C275DB62C7@ricmoo.com> References: <3F757B30-70CA-464F-9879-84C275DB62C7@ricmoo.com> From: Marco Pontello Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 16:51:52 +0200 Message-ID: To: Richard Moore Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133d38ae95f77051eb0b185 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: "bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] RFC - BIP: URI scheme for Blockchain exploration X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 14:52:13 -0000 --001a1133d38ae95f77051eb0b185 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 9:28 PM, Richard Moore wrote: > Yes! Good point, network should be encoded. Not sure I like this format > yet, but what if it was part of the authority, like block:testnet. Like > http uses port 80 by default, you could have block by default refer to > block:mainnet. > > Eg. > > blockchain://tx:testnet3/3b95a766d7a99b87188d6875c8484cb2b310b78459b7816d4dfc3f0f7e04281a > > I will read the RFC over more thoroughly tomorrow to get an idea of what > types of things make more or less sense. Like this option too! -- Try the Online TrID File Identifier http://mark0.net/onlinetrid.aspx --001a1133d38ae95f77051eb0b185 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On S= at, Aug 29, 2015 at 9:28 PM, Richard Moore <me@ricmoo.com> wrote= :
Yes! Good point, network should be enco= ded. Not sure I like this format yet, but what if it was part of the author= ity, like block:testnet. Like http uses port 80 by default, you could have = block by default refer to block:mainnet.

Eg.
blockchain://tx:testnet3/3b95a766d7a99b87188d6875c8484cb2b310b78459b7816d4d= fc3f0f7e04281a

I will read the RFC over more thoroughly tomorrow to get an idea of what ty= pes of things make more or less sense.=C2=A0

Like this option too!


--
Try the Online TrID File Identifier
http://mark0.net/on= linetrid.aspx
--001a1133d38ae95f77051eb0b185--