1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1EC1FF5
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 9 Jan 2018 01:13:41 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail148102.authsmtp.net (outmail148102.authsmtp.net
[62.13.148.102])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9705AE3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 9 Jan 2018 01:13:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c245.authsmtp.com (mail-c245.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.245])
by punt20.authsmtp.com. (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w091Dcc1012811;
Tue, 9 Jan 2018 01:13:38 GMT (envelope-from pete@petertodd.org)
Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com
[52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w091DaQv063630
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
Tue, 9 Jan 2018 01:13:37 GMT (envelope-from pete@petertodd.org)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD9A340110;
Tue, 9 Jan 2018 01:13:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0CDDE208A8; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 20:13:35 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 20:13:35 -0500
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Rhavar <rhavar@protonmail.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <20180109011335.GA22039@savin.petertodd.org>
References: <CAAS2fgR-or=zksQ929Muvgr=sgzNSugGp669ZWYC6YkvEG=H5w@mail.gmail.com>
<ae570ccf-3a2c-a11c-57fa-6dad78cfb1a5@satoshilabs.com>
<CAAS2fgRQvpa8VXE8YAYSfugDvCu=1+5ANsGk1V_OXtHPGD=Ltw@mail.gmail.com>
<vJsDz9YdeNQQ_PZRf5HP1W0FmcWyKHIuwN9QeNgN-WXCdQcRmXLtkQ3wfTO7YUCgG6AFgOkKeU6fdsGTKkGcnk-_OOY_jyNlfWkFQ31d2ZU=@protonmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <vJsDz9YdeNQQ_PZRf5HP1W0FmcWyKHIuwN9QeNgN-WXCdQcRmXLtkQ3wfTO7YUCgG6AFgOkKeU6fdsGTKkGcnk-_OOY_jyNlfWkFQ31d2ZU=@protonmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Server-Quench: 51ff856b-f4da-11e7-9f3b-9cb654bb2504
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aQdMdgsUElQaAgsB Am4bW1VeUV57WmQ7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq
T0pMXVMcUwVhAGhQ Z1geVBp0dAUIcX13 ZwhnXyYNVEF8J1sr
RhoFCGwHMGB9YTYc Al1RJFFSdQcYLB1A alQxNiYHcQ5VPz4z
GA41ejw8IwAXEy1J RRoNLFYbS11DBTM3 XR0eVS4vFFcIS20r
NR04I0IRVEUcIw0p OlssXF9w
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1039:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Satoshilabs secret shared private key scheme
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 01:13:42 -0000
--vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 07:40:38PM -0500, Rhavar via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> I think you're under-appreciating how useful the "plausible deniability".=
Someone I know was (solo) traveling to the United States when a border age=
nt asked her to unlocked her phone; thumbed through her apps, ended up find=
ing tinder and went through all her recent conversations to make sure she w=
asn't involved in any "pay for sex things".
>=20
> In the same light, I travel frequently and constantly have my trezor on m=
e. If I am asked to unlock it, I will have no problems doing so (as refusal=
will no doubt lead to deportation) and showing my personal wallet (which s=
adly hasn't had much use since fees became ridiculous).
Trezor's "plausible deniability" scheme could very well result in you going=
to
jail for lying to border security, because it's so easy for them to simply
brute force alternate passwords based on your seeds. With that, they have p=
roof
that you lied to customs, a serious offense.
I would strongly advise you not to use it in that situation.
--=20
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
--vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJaVBc7AAoJECSBQD2l8JH77PQIAKJNd0fGKjHgzjMjl3EoPstk
dzKIHF1/YUeWd5zYViOVlf2iVKTh9aj4kXPqfzljl+ryBc//p7GswDYIt9VRXb/L
twiwyLPad/1BlnL7ZiOOwaWivRJ3f1wq7L00vPvgIy5pkCx62KlOyp4x6W1xmZHz
E0RWXP/8PaHzOzNz/Y+US+ldImV/WvoZdhLNBXfJl674dlkG/g40MkQxrEsWLznp
yzEgzxumIPzleJvqQV5ZUVGag0pbavzo6sVVCWdAy1IUbEd+RmPuIkghsolz3Jd2
oZCjZ5WXfSva3QGNJIAAgNt5982AqLbKj+h3ZGhM/MctxZ2LSk5OAoxCeQ/nMbo=
=7wQ1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd--
|
