1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
|
Return-Path: <tier.nolan@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C72488A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 8 Aug 2016 11:02:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-qt0-f170.google.com (mail-qt0-f170.google.com
[209.85.216.170])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3327BAA
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 8 Aug 2016 11:01:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qt0-f170.google.com with SMTP id x25so201508034qtx.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 08 Aug 2016 04:01:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:cc;
bh=HVdvnVHUv2A6bcaTOF6IBjNpi91OJXybQj7BGJxPgQQ=;
b=k03c6pi43qvYlFxhy9adegjYCDmIDQKJj9NYhJFsPskDaRdGiVDABz1flaQf7sSt5M
XISJU+t/s71+TwMeXIx7/T0tzUO9yKMr69/q4tgSeUmnd9X9Ke3Cn7osBt2UfACL14tr
a30UPAHxzXEkaRl6FrIROXJIWlEkBZ3NQyDwM+hFa7zXbjzvSrYVznaNOhVavldPO6K7
/rY6avKYzbKYwFFDcrs25vxYUANUTjS0HvMNy2c08YGLvYF4K4U6/042cqQlayPezddp
seWvZ9XlS9HnM3LFXvQlPbkO37xVVv2ffhI9gmK32E46Wausy6hn/wvIHybCrowbvQIi
RW9A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:cc;
bh=HVdvnVHUv2A6bcaTOF6IBjNpi91OJXybQj7BGJxPgQQ=;
b=ChXpcTwvfFMdp7UB4CmO1yyWnNctE++RKN3UUfTxb4T/3Qk4egE0t14HaZ2qWNrnso
zr9DbR2ZsL3u41UBBRAiiUNrt0A8jq6AK3hsQpH/+Ksw1X7dCVUIbn+Qa2JjLhpuXpFt
3QLERDCUqIPzSLc8Z/mTrxsQgjXvYnvxRK0ZzccAndxLNKyn0mrpf6Fj0257U/ugVTnX
wO2qpRSYvDSHVG3z+vMX+dHmvBz/osTGWyZR0R+P02W7WJtD1rWKseUywr1g4ySAPuVs
/ZQDpfC8OmZxVtdlTlTUvXy7xXRYmRgPxK9pAv/bvRC8FRP6q+YnSq/Cg9oz4a0/0cib
ut1Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoousqmuNhlNqVxiaNUoa6rMVpiRaL1MoYgDOS3vykM6EPh8wkBB9YIyD8pTmzA1tnTn8aqldmFd/fJpvoUQ==
X-Received: by 10.237.35.201 with SMTP id k9mr26998098qtc.92.1470654118407;
Mon, 08 Aug 2016 04:01:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.200.46.193 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 04:01:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJowKgKUCXo7fD_R73c2cGcet+GzrRR6-=H1uOpAHzqsbbTDxw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAEDBiGMGWLeC81vkojGwEqQTT1HQaE=a3z114u6=FXXM2DRtQ@mail.gmail.com>
<0b314ab7-b5ec-3468-15d7-37e07a6b592c@sky-ip.org>
<CAE-z3OUJBVn8Ogc8gCZbJ0V_JV1UQjk0FSBjguzwgZ5kTjBTtA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAEDBiGWuV+6cXzbs0eAUNFZJ4KWFGUF7oeCTEKkGGjmrTB-cw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJowKgK4EckX86M6Gt-XYCuwOdSwcVtHZW8oYZn-AC55gYqUZQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAEDBiF1F1FkBXWQn_JgE0cr-aeVRAi29ETow0Sg95DO2MBGWQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJowKgKUCXo7fD_R73c2cGcet+GzrRR6-=H1uOpAHzqsbbTDxw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tier Nolan <tier.nolan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 12:01:57 +0100
Message-ID: <CAE-z3OVSP7rvV7SJXJNkUw40mxfrVv-u3vgBZ5d5ZvtKs=w+iw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1139659850b45a05398d58e3
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
MALFORMED_FREEMAIL,
MISSING_HEADERS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP clearing house addresses
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 11:02:02 -0000
--001a1139659850b45a05398d58e3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
With channels and the exchange acting as hub, you can do instant trades
between altcoins.
This doesn't work with fiat accounts. A "100% reserve" company could issue
fiat tokens. The exchange could then trade those tokens.
This eliminates the counter-party risk for the exchange. If the exchange
dies, you still have your (alt)coins and also fiat tokens.
There is still risk that the token company could go bankrupt though. This
could be mitigated by that company requiring only "cashing out" tokens to
accounts which have been verified.
The company could set up a blockchain where it signed the blocks rather
than mining and could get money from transaction fees and also minting fees
(say it charges 1% for minting new tokens)
I wonder what how the law would work for that. It isn't actually doing
trading, it is just issuing tokens and redeeming them.
--001a1139659850b45a05398d58e3
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>With channels and the exchange acting as hub, you can=
do instant trades between altcoins.<br><br></div><div>This doesn't wor=
k with fiat accounts.=C2=A0 A "100% reserve" company could issue =
fiat tokens.=C2=A0 The exchange could then trade those tokens.<br><br></div=
><div>This eliminates the counter-party risk for the exchange.=C2=A0 If the=
exchange dies, you still have your (alt)coins and also fiat tokens.<br><br=
></div><div>There is still risk that the token company could go bankrupt th=
ough.=C2=A0 This could be mitigated by that company requiring only "ca=
shing out" tokens to accounts which have been verified.<br><br></div><=
div>The company could set up a blockchain where it signed the blocks rather=
than mining and could get money from transaction fees and also minting fee=
s (say it charges 1% for minting new tokens)<br></div><div><br></div><div>I=
wonder what how the law would work for that.=C2=A0 It isn't actually d=
oing trading, it is just issuing tokens and redeeming them.<br></div></div>
--001a1139659850b45a05398d58e3--
|
