summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/0b/f215414b910fd6100444d96370428e5697bd86
blob: 81041902cb3e3e1adbb54b9ea592f0701c7aa4c1 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
Return-Path: <aj@erisian.com.au>
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF6EEC002A
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Thu, 20 Apr 2023 02:27:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8150C60FA3
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Thu, 20 Apr 2023 02:27:24 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 8150C60FA3
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id IiGunChn-q_X
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Thu, 20 Apr 2023 02:27:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 712A660AF8
Received: from cerulean.erisian.com.au (azure.erisian.com.au [172.104.61.193])
 by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 712A660AF8
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Thu, 20 Apr 2023 02:27:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from 60.42.96.58.static.exetel.com.au ([58.96.42.60]
 helo=sapphire.erisian.com.au)
 by cerulean.erisian.com.au with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2)
 (envelope-from <aj@erisian.com.au>)
 id 1ppK0z-0003Xy-Ud; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 12:27:19 +1000
Received: by sapphire.erisian.com.au (sSMTP sendmail emulation);
 Thu, 20 Apr 2023 12:27:13 +1000
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 12:27:13 +1000
From: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
To: Michael Folkson <michaelfolkson@protonmail.com>,
 Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <ZECjAWr1cYtBKb+U@erisian.com.au>
References: <uuq_VbxJp50_-m4ufKpEhJOknhZ0pvK8ioDabCkxtDjBYauO3gLKrj2O2tjS6YIFOnJLyaZg6-LENzom1DyQQ3TyMLIIaGz5IRrzrKB8gRs=@protonmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <uuq_VbxJp50_-m4ufKpEhJOknhZ0pvK8ioDabCkxtDjBYauO3gLKrj2O2tjS6YIFOnJLyaZg6-LENzom1DyQQ3TyMLIIaGz5IRrzrKB8gRs=@protonmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -1.0
X-Spam_bar: -
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core maintainers and communication on
 merge decisions
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 02:27:24 -0000

On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 12:40:44PM +0000, Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> I do think the perception that it is “the one and only” staging
> ground for consensus changes is dangerous

If you think that about any open source project, the answer is simple:
create your own fork and do a better job. Competition is the only answer
to concerns about the bad effects from a monopoly. (Often the good effects
from cooperation and collaboration -- less wasted time and duplicated
effort -- turn out to outweigh the bad effects, however)

In any event, inquisition isn't "the one and only staging ground for
consensus changes" -- every successful consensus change to date has
been staged through the developers' own repo then the core PR process,
and that option still exists.

Cheers,
aj