summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/04/1268d97d29727f42c47d45baa3dba00a44e2e0
blob: 30287f18eb462b648e693a275dd395f3600485ec (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
Return-Path: <karljohan-alm@garage.co.jp>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEA24F04
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 11 Oct 2019 02:09:15 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 00:08:00 by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mo.garage.hdemail.jp (mo.garage.hdemail.jp [46.51.242.127])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 177DE6E0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 11 Oct 2019 02:09:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ip-10-217-1-36.ap-northeast-1.compute.internal
	(localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by mo.garage.hdemail.jp (hde-mf-postfix) with SMTP id 47E1214C121
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:01:14 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from karljohan-alm@garage.co.jp)
X-Received: from unknown (HELO mo.garage.hdemail.jp) (127.0.0.1)
	by 0 with SMTP; 11 Oct 2019 11:01:06 +0900
X-Received: from mo.garage.hdemail.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by mo.garage.hdemail.jp (hde-ma-postfix) with ESMTP id 397A34C0A9
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:01:06 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from karljohan-alm@garage.co.jp)
Received: from gw17.oz.hdemail.jp
	(ip-10-216-204-196.ap-northeast-1.compute.internal [10.216.204.196])
	by mo.garage.hdemail.jp (hde-mf-postfix) with ESMTP id 33D3E14C10B
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:01:06 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from karljohan-alm@garage.co.jp)
X-Received: from mail-lj1-f200.google.com (lb06.oz.hdemail.jp [54.238.50.28])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by gw17.oz.hdemail.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF6F148C0FC
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:01:05 +0900 (JST)
X-Received: by mail-lj1-f200.google.com with SMTP id i18so1419564ljg.14
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 10 Oct 2019 19:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to;
	bh=vXJor1oRoOFPOLJ+48sEEcifUCX6FfyrnyDZt5ok6YA=;
	b=sL1gYpBIk04vMK9gI2YXb3PPCrVrW0M9RLtpw7jWNO1CIsiI6gXldfbg0OjqCHMoTO
	TmBCJVXaHRJ785zX/KMnklyxgwv0d1eQaa+Zn9WlfTe31udtnwxnn2EhYecJZ6QkYhQp
	LEnFwDDZaeR7osITYdKVb8ZfadK0Z9fvLC5yE0zaJdopq6p0DM7Hyq31Q4z24wFK7VQA
	eQzk6r5eN9MzPew0WGxte5dU2Oa3m1+8D7pNcfKaF3Cbs9QICE/xkBX67e1pGsH0HWEo
	+LFOAs4W39CKXeHiUO+B9sPRB96V+RoWz4H0Bwmw+c25iDeaFCoZ+W5oJlSKcZutzMTh
	Z7AQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWfz20Iz1aXCWdyy/9CS8lyElYYoTprSX/GZhQyY06GPOs05eGG
	E9xZhiYUlRlxXx2tf3GHj/4bhZeXeRILttBewh7croo7YcoccdVtYoRJfD2DfDpJ2vtKsVPWQVu
	3sXEgOU34x+d4bY2P82M0vBxgs6ZkNG3zbH6c1vXWgMJCPt0/rfI+XEudoAQGnX30JtMyODPEWG
	G/SCVGZHZvLqI0IGU704Uw/mx9mAaSRr9zIh+WhQsDnLv2L0tbbnu+gry/i1OidTj5ewnOgw+he
	Nd4LqB3FAk672scs82IaJJFA/G0xb2NzcXLWy1fCFvL0RStthWxYtErlAo+jat4n77eEYY6Tn3t
	AmLVzpDNi5cOtsjCnMs1yA1BFwI=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a0ca:: with SMTP id f10mr7648751ljm.84.1570759263378; 
	Thu, 10 Oct 2019 19:01:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx7mKJ259VsJ4MFGtedeJku/J7/r/+oB327F/DWrGPfdT0wLdshgm9AydVwCcqmouUBQNKfpYIFH5pMS4bASeY=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a0ca:: with SMTP id f10mr7648739ljm.84.1570759263067; 
	Thu, 10 Oct 2019 19:01:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <58e44347-6eee-a0c3-3b8a-965c7450780e@emilengler.com>
	<6fe67006-7131-a861-61fa-65392d5be069@riseup.net>
	<20824fa5-e3fa-8d4e-1678-4c2048b49b6b@emilengler.com>
In-Reply-To: <20824fa5-e3fa-8d4e-1678-4c2048b49b6b@emilengler.com>
From: Karl-Johan Alm <karljohan-alm@garage.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:00:51 +0900
Message-ID: <CALJw2w6FeQDpiFZ9+j-tmho_HMFCyi-0wLrGqze9jD5iSLfuVw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Emil Engler via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIPable-idea: Consistent and better definition of
 the term 'address'
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 02:09:15 -0000

I've proposed bitcoin invoice for awhile now. See
https://twitter.com/kallewoof/status/1165841566105079808

I like bitcoin invoice address into bitcoin address as proposed by Chris.


On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 12:45 AM Emil Engler via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> * Sorry if this mail was sent multiple times, my E-Mail client went crazy *
>
> Thanks for all your feedback.
> I came to the decision to write a BIP for this, even if it might not be
> implemented by many wallets, a standardization is never wrong and this
> would be the first step in the correct direction for better on-chain
> privacy.
>
> However currently we still need a good term for the 'address' replacement.
>
> The current suggestions are:
> * Invoice ID
> * Payment Token
> * Bitcoin invoice (address)
> * Bitcoin invoice (path)
>
> Because of the LN term invoice I really like the term 'Bitcoin Invoice'
> by Chris Belcher.
>
> So how do find a consensus about these terms?
>
> Greetings
> Emil Engler
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev