Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEA24F04 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 02:09:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 00:08:00 by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mo.garage.hdemail.jp (mo.garage.hdemail.jp [46.51.242.127]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 177DE6E0 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 02:09:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ip-10-217-1-36.ap-northeast-1.compute.internal (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mo.garage.hdemail.jp (hde-mf-postfix) with SMTP id 47E1214C121 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:01:14 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from karljohan-alm@garage.co.jp) X-Received: from unknown (HELO mo.garage.hdemail.jp) (127.0.0.1) by 0 with SMTP; 11 Oct 2019 11:01:06 +0900 X-Received: from mo.garage.hdemail.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mo.garage.hdemail.jp (hde-ma-postfix) with ESMTP id 397A34C0A9 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:01:06 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from karljohan-alm@garage.co.jp) Received: from gw17.oz.hdemail.jp (ip-10-216-204-196.ap-northeast-1.compute.internal [10.216.204.196]) by mo.garage.hdemail.jp (hde-mf-postfix) with ESMTP id 33D3E14C10B for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:01:06 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from karljohan-alm@garage.co.jp) X-Received: from mail-lj1-f200.google.com (lb06.oz.hdemail.jp [54.238.50.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gw17.oz.hdemail.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF6F148C0FC for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:01:05 +0900 (JST) X-Received: by mail-lj1-f200.google.com with SMTP id i18so1419564ljg.14 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 19:01:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=vXJor1oRoOFPOLJ+48sEEcifUCX6FfyrnyDZt5ok6YA=; b=sL1gYpBIk04vMK9gI2YXb3PPCrVrW0M9RLtpw7jWNO1CIsiI6gXldfbg0OjqCHMoTO TmBCJVXaHRJ785zX/KMnklyxgwv0d1eQaa+Zn9WlfTe31udtnwxnn2EhYecJZ6QkYhQp LEnFwDDZaeR7osITYdKVb8ZfadK0Z9fvLC5yE0zaJdopq6p0DM7Hyq31Q4z24wFK7VQA eQzk6r5eN9MzPew0WGxte5dU2Oa3m1+8D7pNcfKaF3Cbs9QICE/xkBX67e1pGsH0HWEo +LFOAs4W39CKXeHiUO+B9sPRB96V+RoWz4H0Bwmw+c25iDeaFCoZ+W5oJlSKcZutzMTh Z7AQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWfz20Iz1aXCWdyy/9CS8lyElYYoTprSX/GZhQyY06GPOs05eGG E9xZhiYUlRlxXx2tf3GHj/4bhZeXeRILttBewh7croo7YcoccdVtYoRJfD2DfDpJ2vtKsVPWQVu 3sXEgOU34x+d4bY2P82M0vBxgs6ZkNG3zbH6c1vXWgMJCPt0/rfI+XEudoAQGnX30JtMyODPEWG G/SCVGZHZvLqI0IGU704Uw/mx9mAaSRr9zIh+WhQsDnLv2L0tbbnu+gry/i1OidTj5ewnOgw+he Nd4LqB3FAk672scs82IaJJFA/G0xb2NzcXLWy1fCFvL0RStthWxYtErlAo+jat4n77eEYY6Tn3t AmLVzpDNi5cOtsjCnMs1yA1BFwI= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a0ca:: with SMTP id f10mr7648751ljm.84.1570759263378; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 19:01:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx7mKJ259VsJ4MFGtedeJku/J7/r/+oB327F/DWrGPfdT0wLdshgm9AydVwCcqmouUBQNKfpYIFH5pMS4bASeY= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a0ca:: with SMTP id f10mr7648739ljm.84.1570759263067; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 19:01:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <58e44347-6eee-a0c3-3b8a-965c7450780e@emilengler.com> <6fe67006-7131-a861-61fa-65392d5be069@riseup.net> <20824fa5-e3fa-8d4e-1678-4c2048b49b6b@emilengler.com> In-Reply-To: <20824fa5-e3fa-8d4e-1678-4c2048b49b6b@emilengler.com> From: Karl-Johan Alm Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:00:51 +0900 Message-ID: To: Emil Engler via bitcoin-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIPable-idea: Consistent and better definition of the term 'address' X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 02:09:15 -0000 I've proposed bitcoin invoice for awhile now. See https://twitter.com/kallewoof/status/1165841566105079808 I like bitcoin invoice address into bitcoin address as proposed by Chris. On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 12:45 AM Emil Engler via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > * Sorry if this mail was sent multiple times, my E-Mail client went crazy * > > Thanks for all your feedback. > I came to the decision to write a BIP for this, even if it might not be > implemented by many wallets, a standardization is never wrong and this > would be the first step in the correct direction for better on-chain > privacy. > > However currently we still need a good term for the 'address' replacement. > > The current suggestions are: > * Invoice ID > * Payment Token > * Bitcoin invoice (address) > * Bitcoin invoice (path) > > Because of the LN term invoice I really like the term 'Bitcoin Invoice' > by Chris Belcher. > > So how do find a consensus about these terms? > > Greetings > Emil Engler > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev