MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <58e44347-6eee-a0c3-3b8a-965c7450780e@emilengler.com>
	<6fe67006-7131-a861-61fa-65392d5be069@riseup.net>
	<20824fa5-e3fa-8d4e-1678-4c2048b49b6b@emilengler.com>
In-Reply-To: <20824fa5-e3fa-8d4e-1678-4c2048b49b6b@emilengler.com>
From: Karl-Johan Alm <karljohan-alm@garage.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:00:51 +0900
Message-ID: <CALJw2w6FeQDpiFZ9+j-tmho_HMFCyi-0wLrGqze9jD5iSLfuVw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Emil Engler via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIPable-idea: Consistent and better definition of
 the term 'address'
Precedence: list

I've proposed bitcoin invoice for awhile now. See
https://twitter.com/kallewoof/status/1165841566105079808

I like bitcoin invoice address into bitcoin address as proposed by Chris.


On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 12:45 AM Emil Engler via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> * Sorry if this mail was sent multiple times, my E-Mail client went crazy *
>
> Thanks for all your feedback.
> I came to the decision to write a BIP for this, even if it might not be
> implemented by many wallets, a standardization is never wrong and this
> would be the first step in the correct direction for better on-chain
> privacy.
>
> However currently we still need a good term for the 'address' replacement.
>
> The current suggestions are:
> * Invoice ID
> * Payment Token
> * Bitcoin invoice (address)
> * Bitcoin invoice (path)
>
> Because of the LN term invoice I really like the term 'Bitcoin Invoice'
> by Chris Belcher.
>
> So how do find a consensus about these terms?
>
> Greetings
> Emil Engler
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev