Age | Commit message (Expand) | Author | Files | Lines |
2022-07-19 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin covenants are inevitable | Anthony Towns | 1 | -0/+182 |
2022-05-22 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] MuSig2 BIP | AdamISZ | 1 | -0/+133 |
2022-02-20 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Pre-BIP] Fee Accounts | Jeremy Rubin | 1 | -0/+362 |
2021-09-09 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] TAPLEAF_UPDATE_VERIFY covenant opcode | Anthony Towns | 1 | -0/+303 |
2021-07-05 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unlimited covenants, was Re: CHECKSIGFROMSTACK/{Verify} BIP... | Matt Corallo | 1 | -0/+126 |
2021-05-27 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Opinion on proof of stake in future | Billy Tetrud | 1 | -0/+2065 |
2021-04-23 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm | Antoine Riard | 1 | -0/+216 |
2021-04-12 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] maximum block height on transaction | Billy Tetrud | 1 | -0/+300 |
2021-03-24 | [bitcoin-dev] March 23rd 2021 Taproot Activation Meeting Notes | Jeremy | 1 | -0/+227 |
2021-03-21 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] (Recurring) Taproot activation meeting on IRC - Tuesday 23r... | Jeremy | 1 | -0/+408 |
2021-02-28 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Straight Flag Day (Height) Taproot Activation | Matt Corallo | 1 | -0/+102 |
2021-02-25 | [bitcoin-dev] Exploring alternative activation mechanisms: decreasing threshold | Gregorio Guidi | 1 | -0/+233 |
2021-02-11 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP32/43-based standard for Schnorr signatures & decentrali... | Dr Maxim Orlovsky | 1 | -0/+83 |
2020-12-22 | [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Wallet Interface | monokh | 1 | -0/+376 |
2020-12-16 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] bip48 proposal | Keagan McClelland | 1 | -0/+223 |
2020-09-21 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Statechain coinswap: assigning blame for failure in a two-s... | ZmnSCPxj | 1 | -0/+125 |
2020-05-24 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] hashcash-newhash | Ariel Lorenzo-Luaces | 1 | -0/+383 |
2019-06-09 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] [PROPOSAL] Emergency RBF (BIP 125) | Rusty Russell | 1 | -0/+101 |
2017-12-24 | [bitcoin-dev] BIP 177: UTPFOTIB - Use Transaction Priority For Ordering Trans... | Damian Williamson | 1 | -0/+208 |
2017-06-03 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Segwit2Mb - combined soft/hard fork - Request For Comments | Oliver Petruzel | 1 | -0/+116 |
2017-05-26 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Emergency Deployment of SegWit as a partial mitigation of C... | Eric Voskuil | 1 | -0/+249 |
2017-05-04 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Full node "tip" function | Tomas | 1 | -0/+178 |
2017-04-25 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] I do not support the BIP 148 UASF | Luke Dashjr | 1 | -0/+78 |
2017-04-06 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Segwit2Mb - combined soft/hard fork - Request For Comments | Aymeric Vitte | 1 | -0/+315 |
2017-04-06 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: Inhibiting a covert attack on the Bitcoin POW... | Luv Khemani | 1 | -0/+924 |
2017-03-28 | [bitcoin-dev] Hard fork proposal from last week's meeting | Wang Chun | 1 | -0/+96 |
2017-03-20 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Malice Reactive Proof of Work Additions (MR POWA): Protecti... | David Vorick | 1 | -0/+102 |
2017-03-18 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Requirement for pseudonymous BIP submissions | Chris Stewart | 1 | -0/+436 |
2017-01-03 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Script Abuse Potential? | Jeremy | 1 | -0/+183 |
2016-09-23 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Requesting BIP assignment; Flexible Transactions. | Christian Decker | 1 | -0/+177 |
2016-06-23 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Even more proposed BIP extensions to BIP 0070 | Justin Newton | 1 | -0/+573 |
2016-06-23 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Even more proposed BIP extensions to BIP 0070 | Peter Todd | 1 | -0/+163 |
2016-01-26 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BIP Draft] Allow zero value OP_RETURN in Payment Protocol | Luke Dashjr | 1 | -0/+76 |
2015-12-30 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] An implementation of BIP102 as a softfork. | Peter Todd | 1 | -0/+115 |
2015-12-09 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Scaling by Partitioning | Andrew | 1 | -0/+260 |
2015-12-08 | [bitcoin-dev] BIP 9 style version bits for txns | Vincent Truong | 1 | -0/+142 |
2015-11-25 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Alternative name for CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY (BIP112) | Eric Lombrozo | 1 | -0/+394 |
2015-11-13 | [bitcoin-dev] Block Compression (Datastream Compression) test results using t... | Peter Tschipper | 1 | -0/+368 |
2015-10-06 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin network simulation testing? | Andrew Miller | 1 | -0/+163 |
2015-10-02 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Versionbits BIP (009) minor revision proposal. | Rusty Russell | 1 | -0/+80 |
2015-10-01 | [bitcoin-dev] Crossing the line? [Was: Re: Let's deploy BIP65 CHECKLOCKTIMEVE... | Tao Effect | 1 | -0/+228 |
2015-08-29 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] RFC - BIP: URI scheme for Blockchain exploration | Richard Moore | 1 | -0/+261 |
2015-08-22 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Dynamically Controlled Bitcoin Block Size Max Cap | Peter Todd | 1 | -0/+91 |
2015-08-11 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Fees and the block-finding process | Mark Friedenbach | 1 | -0/+414 |
2015-08-07 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Fees and the block-finding process | Jorge Timón | 1 | -0/+93 |
2015-08-06 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Idea: Efficient bitcoin block propagation | Gregory Maxwell | 1 | -0/+108 |
2015-07-31 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] A compromise between BIP101 and Pieter's proposal | Dave Scotese | 1 | -0/+134 |
2015-07-23 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Electrum Server Speed Test | Joseph Gleason ⑈ | 1 | -0/+172 |
2015-07-18 | [bitcoin-dev] Do we really need a mempool? (for relay nodes) | Peter Todd | 1 | -0/+120 |
2015-06-23 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Draft BIP : fixed-schedule block size increase | Gavin Andresen | 1 | -0/+195 |