Colorimetric Assays
Here
is a description of how one sets up and runs a colorimetric assay
to determine the concentration of a substance that is in
solution.
General approach
We cannot put material under a microscope
and count the number of molecules per unit
volume the way we can count number of cells
per unit volume. We must find something that
we can measure that is proportional to the
concentration of the substance of interest.
The measurement most commonly used in
assays is absorbance of light. Beer's Law tells
us that if a solute absorbs light of a particular
wavelength, the absorbance is directly proportional
to the concentration of substance in solution.
A device called a spectrophotometer
is used to measure and display and/or record
absorbance in quantifiable units. Often the
substance by itself does not absorb light so
as to allow for a practical assay. We may have
to employ one or more reagents to produce colored
compounds in proportion to the concentration
of unknown.
Measuring absorbance of light by a sample
tells us very little unless we have a standard
for comparison. For example, if sample X shows
absorbance of 0.5, what is the actual concentration
of X? If we have a sample of known concentration,
and that sample also gives absorbance of 0.5,
then we are reasonably sure that the substance
has that same concentration. Suppose that you
have a number of samples, and their concentrations
vary. It would be useful to have a number of
standards that span the full range of likely
concentrations of our unknown. That's where
a standard curve comes into it. We prepare
a series of standards of known concentration
of X, ranging from low to high concentration.
We run the assay and plot absorbance versus
concentration for each standard. Using this
standard curve we can read the concentration
for an unknown given its absorbance reading.
Controls
When we run an assay we must ensure that only
the substance we are assaying is responsible
for absorbance of light in the wavelength range
of interest. All conditions
under which standards and unknowns are prepared
should be kept identical. If solutes in the
sample buffers affect absorbance, then we
have a problem. We won't obtain accurate results
if we vary the volumes in which we prepare
and assay standards and unknowns. The timing
of reading absorbance, temperature at which
we keep the materials, and all other physical
factors should be kept the same. Because it
is not always practical to use identical buffers
for all unknowns and standards, we need only
ensure that none of the components of any of
the buffers has a significant effect on absorbance.
When we use the same volume for all standards
and unknowns we simplify the analysis considerably.
The standard curve can plot absorbance versus
amount of substance instead of concentration.
It may be less confusing to work with amounts
while doing an assay, especially if dilutions
are required. As long as you know the original
volume of sample that was used in an assay,
determination of concentration is easy.
Complication
All assays have limits. Amounts of substance
below some minimum will be undetectable. Beyond
some maximum amount or concentration an assay
becomes saturated, that is, increases in amount
or concentration do not affect absorbance.
We generally try to work within the linear
range of an assay, that is, where absorbance
is directly proportional to concentration.
Ideally, we would set up standards that encompass
the entire useful range of an assay. That is,
we optimize the range of the assay.
Often a sample is so concentrated that when
you assay the prescribed volume of sample the
result is off scale – the assay reagent is
saturated. The solution then is to dilute the
sample. For example, if the volume of each
standard or sample is 1 ml, and 1 ml of your
unknown gives a result that is off scale, you
can add 0.1 ml sample to a test tube along
with 0.9 ml buffer. If you read a concentration
from the standard curve, then multiply the
result by 10 to get the actual concentration
in the sample. If you read an amount from the
standard curve then simply divide that amount
by 0.1 ml to get your concentration.
When samples are so concentrated that you
cannot pipet a small enough amount accurately,
you may have to conduct serial dilutions.
Example: preparing a standard curve
We will set up a hypothetical assay to measure
substance X. When X is mixed with assay reagent
a complex is formed that absorbs light at wavelength
400 nm. Our spectrophotometer requires that
we put 2 ml volume in each cuvette. A cuvette
is a transparent vessel to
be placed in a light path for measurement of
absorbance. To get the right proportion of
assay reagent to sample, we make our sample
volume 0.5 ml and add 1.5 ml color reagent
to each tube. Set up in this manner the assay
can detect amounts of X of as little as 10
micrograms (µg) to as much as 2 milligrams
(mg).
Reference
To calibrate the spectrophotometer we need
a reference tube that is identical in every
respect to the standards and samples, except
that it does not contain any substance X. With
the light path blocked the spectrophotometer
will be set to read infinite absorbance (no
transmittance of light at all). With the reference
tube in the light path we will set the spectrophotometer
to read zero absorbance. That way, a sample
containing X will give absorbance within that
range. The reference tube is used to give us
the maximum dynamic range.
For this hypothetical example the reference will contain 0.5 ml sample buffer
and 1.5 ml color reagent.
Standards
This example describes a hypothetical assay for illustration purposes only.
We want the best accuracy that we can get,
and our range spans two orders of magnitude,
so one way to set up the standard curve is
with a logarithmic progression of standards.
We need standards from 0.01 mg to 2 mg. Let's
try amounts of 0.01, 0.02, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2,
0.5, 1, and 2 mg. The last gap is rather
wide, so let's toss in one standard of, say,
1.5 mg. To prepare standards it is convenient
to start with a concentrated stock solution
of the substance. The largest amount that we
need is 2 mg, in a volume of 0.5 ml. Just to
give us a little "wiggle room" let's make a
stock solution of 5 mg/ml substance
X. The following table presents the calculations.
Table 1. Example of how to plan a standard curve. The concentration of protein in the stock solution was
5 mg/ml. This example is for illustration purposes only.
amount of substance X (mg) |
volume of stock solution (µl) |
volume of buffer (µl) |
0 (reference)
|
0 |
500 |
0.01 |
2 |
498* |
0.02 |
4 |
496* |
0.05 |
10
|
490 |
0.1 |
20 |
480 |
0.2 |
40 |
460 |
0.5 |
100 |
400 |
1 |
200 |
300 |
1.5 |
300 |
200 |
2 |
400 |
100 |
*It is common
to use pipettors that give us volumes that
are accurate to no more than 2 significant figures.
The volume of buffer is not as
critical as the volume of stock solution. Errors
in pipetting buffer affect total volume and,
thus, concentration of the color reagent. Errors
of less than 1% will not have a significant effect
on the results. In fact, if the volume of color
reagent far exceeds the volume of sample (not
in this case) we would not even need to equalize
volumes by adding buffer.
Some labs are not equipped with
pipettors that go below 5 µl with accuracy. It
may be necessary to conduct a serial dilution
to get, say, 2 or 4 µl stock solution into an
assay tube.
Sample preparation
It helps to have a reasonable estimate
of ranges of concentrations of sample that one
can expect. Even with such an estimate it is
good to prepare samples with a range of dilutions,
in case a sample is so concentrated that its
absorbance readings are out of range.
For the assay in the example, if we use 500 µl
sample in an assay tube (the maximum volume),
its concentration would have to be less than
4 mg/ml to give a readable absorbance. On the
other hand, we would want that much if the sample
was, say, ten times less concentrated. Knowing
nothing about the concentration of a particular
sample, we would load one tube with 500 µl to
cover that range. Since the assay spans a wide
range of concentrations, we can use 50 µl in
a second assay tube. Now the sample can be as
concentrated as 40 mg/ml and we will still have
4 mg or less in the assay tube, giving a readable
result. To cover all of the bases we can assay
a third tube with just 5 µl sample.
Run the assay
When all of the standard and unknowns
are ready we will have:
- 1 reference tube
- some number of standards that span
the full range of the assay
- two or three assay tubes per sample representing
a series of dilutions
It is time to conduct the procedure
for color development, which may be as simple
as adding a color reagent and letting the samples
sit for a few minutes. When practical, treatment
of each standard and sample should be timed so
that absorbance is read following the same time
interval for each tube. The instrument should
be calibrated, then absorbances should be taken
for each tube in order. A standard curve is obtained
by plotting absorbance versus amount of substance
X. If the relationship is clearly linear, a standard
curve isn't even necessary. Amounts can be determined
using interpolation. A curve should be constructed
the first time an assay is used, to check for
accuracy and linearity.
Example of a standard curve
Here is what the plot might look
like in a lab notebook (the student obviously
has excellent handwriting). The relationship
is not perfectly linear, rather it shows a typical
extinction pattern.
Since the range is so wide, for
samples giving very low absorbance readings a
student might want a second higher resolution
plot.
Determine concentration of a sample
A concentration is an amount of
something per unit volume. We typically report
protein concentrations in milligrams per milliliter(mg/ml),
although it is sometimes convenient to use micrograms/microliter
(µg/µl) or perhaps even µg/ml (for very small
concentrations). For an unknown, we divide amount
of substance (from the standard curve) by the
volume of sample used in the assay. Note that
this volume is not the assay volume, nor is it
the diluted sample volume. Divide by the volume
of undiluted sample that you placed in the assay
tube.
Let us suppose that you prepared
three assay tubes for sample #1, containing 500
µl, 50 µl, and 5 µl sample,
respectively. Suppose they gave absorbance readings
of 0.86, 0.12, and 0.01, respectively. The last
absorbance is off scale, of course. The intercept
should be zero, but we cannot count on very low
absorbances giving us sufficiently accurate readings.\
An
absorbance of 0.86 corresponds with 1.7 mg substance
X. The volume was 500 µl
(0.5 ml), so we get a concentration of 3.4 mg/ml.
Sounds good. Checking the other readable tube,
absorbance of 0.12 indicates that the tube contained
0.20 mg substance X. The volume was 50 µl
(0.050 ml). The concentration should be 0.20
mg/0.050 ml = 4.0 mg/ml. Which result do we use,
or do we take an average?
I've found that using the
one absorbance reading that falls closest to
the middle of the sensitive range gives the most
accurate results. In the example above the center
is an asorbance of 0.5, corresponding to 0.1
mg of substance. The absorbance
scale is logarithmic, so that even from a digital
display the readings are more reliable at the
low end of the scale. However, at very low absorbances
one or more unknown factors, such as a defect
in the sample tube or cuvette, will have a more
profound effect on the absorbance value than
at higher absorbances. At the upper end of the
range the color reagent approaches saturation,
so that not only do you have less resolution
among absorbance readings, but the reagent is
less sensitive to differences in protein concentration.
|