Miss Pop Ulation (was: population, homosexuality)
From: Pvthur@aol.com
Date: Wed Dec 01 1999 - 09:39:56 MST
- Next message: Michael M. Butler: "Re: Uplifting II"
- Previous message: hal@finney.org: "Re: Uploads and betrayal"
- Next in thread: Dan Fabulich: "Re: Miss Pop Ulation (was: population, homosexuality)"
- Reply: Dan Fabulich: "Re: Miss Pop Ulation (was: population, homosexuality)"
- Reply: Robert J. Bradbury: "Re: Miss Pop Ulation (was: population, homosexuality)"
- Reply: Spike Jones: "Re: Miss Pop Ulation (was: population, homosexuality)"
- Maybe reply: EvMick@aol.com: "Re: Miss Pop Ulation (was: population, homosexuality)"
- Maybe reply: Pvthur@aol.com: "Re: Miss Pop Ulation (was: population, homosexuality)"
- Maybe reply: EvMick@aol.com: "Re: Miss Pop Ulation (was: population, homosexuality)"
- Maybe reply: EvMick@aol.com: "Re: Miss Pop Ulation (was: population, homosexuality)"
- Maybe reply: EvMick@aol.com: "Re: Miss Pop Ulation (was: population, homosexuality)"
- Maybe reply: CurtAdams@aol.com: "Re: Miss Pop Ulation (was: population, homosexuality)"
- Maybe reply: Gina Miller: "Re: Miss Pop Ulation (was: population, homosexuality)"
- Maybe reply: crowboy: "Re: Miss Pop Ulation (was: population, homosexuality)"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
In a message dated 12/1/99 8:27:49 AM Mountain Standard Time,
bradbury@www.aeiveos.com writes:
<< I think homosexuality might to some degree simply (be) a strong dose
of human "hypersexuality" combined with a loss of discrimination for
the a biologically "productive" mate >>
To paraphrase: 'I think gays are two people of the same sex who are having
sex. Oh, and they're having too much sex.'
You are defining a term using that same term. And you're pandering to the
common notion that gays are over-sexed. Shame on you. We don't need to be
cured by you. Get used to it.
To quote: 'Evolution is a drag queen with many wigs.' - Charles Darwin
For humans, the twin pressures of predation and starvation have been
diminishing for a long time, allowing our population to grow beyond all
natural bounds. As we approach the big 10 billion, something has to give. I
think mother nature is already on the job.
To assert: 'Homosexuality is an evolutionary response to overpopulation.'
This little answer solves a couple little problems:
1) Gays are unnatural. (No they're not.)
2) Gays are against god. (No they're not, or No god. Take your pick.)
John
- Next message: Michael M. Butler: "Re: Uplifting II"
- Previous message: hal@finney.org: "Re: Uploads and betrayal"
- Next in thread: Dan Fabulich: "Re: Miss Pop Ulation (was: population, homosexuality)"
- Reply: Dan Fabulich: "Re: Miss Pop Ulation (was: population, homosexuality)"
- Reply: Robert J. Bradbury: "Re: Miss Pop Ulation (was: population, homosexuality)"
- Reply: Spike Jones: "Re: Miss Pop Ulation (was: population, homosexuality)"
- Maybe reply: EvMick@aol.com: "Re: Miss Pop Ulation (was: population, homosexuality)"
- Maybe reply: Pvthur@aol.com: "Re: Miss Pop Ulation (was: population, homosexuality)"
- Maybe reply: EvMick@aol.com: "Re: Miss Pop Ulation (was: population, homosexuality)"
- Maybe reply: EvMick@aol.com: "Re: Miss Pop Ulation (was: population, homosexuality)"
- Maybe reply: EvMick@aol.com: "Re: Miss Pop Ulation (was: population, homosexuality)"
- Maybe reply: CurtAdams@aol.com: "Re: Miss Pop Ulation (was: population, homosexuality)"
- Maybe reply: Gina Miller: "Re: Miss Pop Ulation (was: population, homosexuality)"
- Maybe reply: crowboy: "Re: Miss Pop Ulation (was: population, homosexuality)"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5
: Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:54 MST