RE: We are NOT our DNA ( was Motivation and Motives)

From: nanowave (nanowave@shaw.ca)
Date: Tue Oct 08 2002 - 13:50:47 MDT


In reference to WTC/911 Ross A. Finlayson wrote:

>It was hot. The fires were pretty much out. Fuel oil doesn't burn at
>1700 degrees.

This doesn't seem to have much to do with the subject line, but ok. "The
fires were pretty much out," you say? You must mean the impact fireballs
ejecting from the sides of the towers, yes they had definitely died down by
the time the towers fell. But I don't think very much can be said about the
conditions near the tower cores unless you happened to be on the scene in
those last moments - in which case, I suppose congratulations on your
miraculous escape are in order.

>What's the "Big Lie"?

If there is a big lie, and I guess it's only natural that *some* people will
just need there to be one, it's perhaps the fact that Condoleezza Rice was
very probably fully briefed by Sandy Berger on the increasing volatility of
the Al Qaeda situation well beforehand and clearly failed to react (partisan
disdain) . Then she unconvincingly denied that the briefing ever took place.
Not a whopper, but somewhat troubling from a credibility angle as we move
into uncharted waters with respect to Iraq.

>I appreciate your candor.

Then perhaps you'll appreciate mine too. I usually find your posts
interesting from a storytelling, conspiracy theory perspective. Much of what
you write appears to me to be total crap, but you tell it good.

--------

On to the matter of "We are NOT our DNA." We clearly are not our DNA. We are
NOT our water molecules either, just as the music on a CD is not the plastic
and the foil or the ones and zeros that encode it.

SIncerely,
Russell Evermore

(who hereby declares "Crocker's Rules" with the caveat that my time on this
list is often somewhat limited.)



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:17:27 MST