RE: interning nukers

From: Lee Corbin (lcorbin@tsoft.com)
Date: Sun Aug 04 2002 - 13:35:07 MDT


Charles Hixson writes

> > > rather then embrace the fiasco of interring loyal Japanese Americans
> >
> > It worked splendidly. The Black Dragons never got a chance
> > to go into action, which, especially if there had been a Japanese
> > invasion, might have been crippling. Not only that, but the intense
> > racial hatred following Pearl Harbor among some of the white Americans
> > had no local outlet.
>
> In the cases of which I am aware, it worked perfectly in that local whites
> were able to buy up the property of the Japanese for pennies on the dollar.
> No problem occurred in Hawaii, which had a large Japanese population, and
> didn't interr any of them.

Yes, the Japanese got only what the free market would give them.
There were one or two cases where a Jap was selling a car or
something, and several people would show up to take advantage
of his having to sell it, and he'd get quite a good price.

But most often, a lot of Japanese property was suddenly dumped
on the market, and they got incredibly little even with bidding.
Democracies should be proud that so far as I know, it was never
just confiscated the way it always would be in most countries.
But America should be ashamed that at war's end no complete
restitution was made.

I don't understand exactly why Hawaii was treated differently.
In both cases, the military made all the decisions. Maybe since
the military had such a vastly greater per-capita presence in
Hawaii, it was judged that the sabotage possibilities were
non-existent, or they were sure they'd got all the fifth columnists,
or that the local whites weren't going to get out of control. My
best guess is all three.

Lee



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:15:53 MST