From: Spudboy100@aol.com
Date: Fri Apr 12 2002 - 12:47:54 MDT
Samantha noted:
<<I don't think so. The word 'racist' implies prejudice beyond
any facts. It does not simply mean 'emphasis' on race. If it
did then even the word 'caucasian' would be a 'racist' term.
Which would be incredibly silly and meaningless. Racism, real
racism, is very ugly. We should not define it away into triviality.
- samantha>>
I know this is semantic (not samanthic) quibbling, but isn't racism just a
more coherent version of ethnic hatred (read tribal)? I am not even sure
ethnic hatred is even less deadly then racism. For example, the Hutu's versus
the Tutusi was an act of ethic mass murder, and the mass murders in
Yugoslavia during WW2 by Croat Ustashis against Serbs was not based on the
pseudo-scientific belief of "superiority"
We should be concerned over any movement that tries to pimp itself as
futuristic and transhuman, rather then a bunch of skinhead smegmoids
attempting to deceive. "We don't hate, anyone; we just love the white race."
An in-depth reading if this White Nationalist jargon might be: ""therefore,
because we love our race, so much; we will have to eliminate all perceived
competitors."
Allow me to borrow a tactic from Joe McCarthy and young Richard Nixon.
Paraphrasing, watch out people who are "soft" on communism (strikeout)
nazism.
:-) Sauce for the goose is sauce for the goose-stepping gander ;-)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:13:27 MST