Re: META: what is verbal abuse, anyway? (Caution: foul language ahead / not worksafe.)

From: Lee Daniel Crocker (lee@piclab.com)
Date: Tue Dec 11 2001 - 12:21:47 MST

Next message: Dossy: "Natrium : Chrysler Offers Fuel Cell Van with Soapy Twist"
Previous message: E. Shaun Russell: "Re: META: Let's be clear about the ad hominem rule"
In reply to: Dossy: "META: what is verbal abuse, anyway? (Caution: foul language ahead / not worksafe.)"
Next in thread: Eugene Leitl: "Re: META: what is verbal abuse, anyway? (Caution: foul languageahead/ not worksafe.)"
Reply: Eugene Leitl: "Re: META: what is verbal abuse, anyway? (Caution: foul languageahead/ not worksafe.)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> > Um, because some of us don't confuse words with violence.
> > Terms like "verbal abuse" beg the question of whether there
> > is such a thing, and I happen to think there is not.
>
> That's because you're a dumb, cocksucking pigfucker.

Now there's an example of a perfectly relevant, useful,
expressive ad hominem. Well done.

--
Lee Daniel Crocker <lee@piclab.com> <http://www.piclab.com/lee/>
"All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past,
are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified
for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC

Next message: Dossy: "Natrium : Chrysler Offers Fuel Cell Van with Soapy Twist"
Previous message: E. Shaun Russell: "Re: META: Let's be clear about the ad hominem rule"
In reply to: Dossy: "META: what is verbal abuse, anyway? (Caution: foul language ahead / not worksafe.)"
Next in thread: Eugene Leitl: "Re: META: what is verbal abuse, anyway? (Caution: foul languageahead/ not worksafe.)"
Reply: Eugene Leitl: "Re: META: what is verbal abuse, anyway? (Caution: foul languageahead/ not worksafe.)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:12:27 MST