Re: META: what is verbal abuse, anyway? (Caution: foul languageahead/ not worksafe.)

From: Eugene Leitl (Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de)
Date: Wed Dec 12 2001 - 03:21:19 MST

Next message: Anders Sandberg: "OED sf terminology"
Previous message: KPJ: "Re: E X P O N E N T --December 2001 Members Newsletter"
In reply to: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: META: what is verbal abuse, anyway? (Caution: foul language ahead / not worksafe.)"
Next in thread: Michael M. Butler: "Re: META: what is verbal abuse, anyway? (Caution: foul languageahead/ not worksafe.)"
Reply: Michael M. Butler: "Re: META: what is verbal abuse, anyway? (Caution: foul languageahead/ not worksafe.)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Lee Daniel Crocker wrote:

> > That's because you're a dumb, cocksucking pigfucker.
>
> Now there's an example of a perfectly relevant, useful,
> expressive ad hominem. Well done.

Instant argument, just add hominem!

(Of course, the proper endearment form is "you big, dumb dogshit-eating
hillbilly").

-- Eugen* Leitl leitl
______________________________________________________________
ICBMTO: N48 04'14.8'' E11 36'41.2'' http://www.leitl.org
57F9CFD3: ED90 0433 EB74 E4A9 537F CFF5 86E7 629B 57F9 CFD3

Next message: Anders Sandberg: "OED sf terminology"
Previous message: KPJ: "Re: E X P O N E N T --December 2001 Members Newsletter"
In reply to: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: META: what is verbal abuse, anyway? (Caution: foul language ahead / not worksafe.)"
Next in thread: Michael M. Butler: "Re: META: what is verbal abuse, anyway? (Caution: foul languageahead/ not worksafe.)"
Reply: Michael M. Butler: "Re: META: what is verbal abuse, anyway? (Caution: foul languageahead/ not worksafe.)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:12:28 MST