Re: META: Let's be clear about the ad hominem rule

From: E. Shaun Russell (e_shaun@extropy.org)
Date: Tue Dec 11 2001 - 11:52:31 MST


Lee Daniel Crocker wrote:

> > Are we reading the same set of List Rules? I don't see any mention of
> > "Zero Tolerance in the List Rules. I see this:
> > ... Perhaps E. Shaun said something that suggested strict
> > zero tolerance, but that is not in the List Rules.
>
>Indeed. Exponent used the dreaded words, but if that's not
>written into an official policy, then rant withdrawn.

It looks like both Max and Lee are correct on this. I mentioned "zero
tolerance" in the Exponent, but did not write that into the revised list
rules. Consider this both an apology to Lee, and a retraction of the "zero
tolerance" mentioned in Exponent.

That said, the process I mentioned in my earlier posts still rings
true. Ad hominem is *not* allowed on this list, and the list rules
directly reflect that.

                                                 Sincerely,

                                                         E. Shaun Russell

________________________________________________________
E. Shaun Russell Operations Officer, Extropy Institute
e_shaun@extropy.org http://www.extropy.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                  ~K i n e t i c i z e Y o u r P o t e n t i a l~



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:12:27 MST