blob: 8f223e03489583e97c659b557a1aa0f17bc9adf9 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <author@anonymousbitcoinbook.com>) id 1Wd9L3-0000nr-VW
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 24 Apr 2014 02:24:38 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of
anonymousbitcoinbook.com designates 69.89.18.3 as permitted
sender) client-ip=69.89.18.3;
envelope-from=author@anonymousbitcoinbook.com;
helo=gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com;
Received: from gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([69.89.18.3])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with smtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1Wd9L2-0008AZ-Vz for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 24 Apr 2014 02:24:37 +0000
Received: (qmail 25596 invoked by uid 0); 24 Apr 2014 01:56:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw3) (10.0.90.84)
by gproxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 24 Apr 2014 01:56:30 -0000
Received: from just118.justhost.com ([173.254.28.118]) by cmgw3 with
id tdwT1n00L2Yu7hZ01dwW4l; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:56:30 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=XPOjF2RE c=1 sm=1 tr=0
a=iBV2HUWW4UcJ4JmVcQBhJA==:117 a=DZWVvRqoJ4pVHDilFU133g==:17
a=BY8XqHikAAAA:8
a=f5113yIGAAAA:8 a=IDi1JgSWSfwA:10 a=JL0LK2V3eAgA:10 a=S0JrtGnLqBcA:10
a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=iSdyhXBuAAAA:8 a=hMjYVLzx43kA:10 a=Y3P-G0aKTiQA:10
a=vYLlf0Ws61-vnoIZqXYA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
Received: from [50.191.76.100] (port=52871 helo=[10.0.2.15])
by just118.justhost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <author@anonymousbitcoinbook.com>)
id 1Wd8tm-0001yS-RM for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:56:27 -0600
Message-ID: <53586F47.1000606@anonymousbitcoinbook.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 21:56:23 -0400
From: Kristov Atlas <author@anonymousbitcoinbook.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <CAEz79PrAg=yydd3UOk51wGQUWey-KZHUH1Npzwb=qL+6zTj+pQ@mail.gmail.com> <53581D1D.1000709@gmail.com> <CAEz79Poy0XEVyC=nOdhYNVOASvfB-2zHJcjU2hvjA7iDWGDDyw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgSQ6rh1XKao6pv8BmpeRbtqWfUOVF+C1Fi3LEzY1YcPiA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgSQ6rh1XKao6pv8BmpeRbtqWfUOVF+C1Fi3LEzY1YcPiA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Identified-User: {7507:just118.justhost.com:stacksn1:anonymousbitcoinbook.com}
{sentby:smtp auth 50.191.76.100 authed with
author@anonymousbitcoinbook.com}
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Headers-End: 1Wd9L2-0008AZ-Vz
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Development Roadmap of Bitcoin Core 0.9.2
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 02:24:38 -0000
On 04/23/2014 06:28 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> Tails users usually can't really build it from source— talks is a live
> boot mostly stateless linux distribution for privacy applications.
> It's really good in general.
>
> I agree that we shouldn't be statically linking QT on linux generally
> (due to things like theming), though maybe we could just have the
> build process dump out a seperate extra static QT binary just for
> these other cases? I feel like the work maintaining it would be less
> than what we've had in answering questions/complaints about it.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dumping out a separate, extra static QT binary is a great idea.
|
