Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of
	anonymousbitcoinbook.com designates 69.89.18.3 as permitted
	sender) client-ip=69.89.18.3;
	envelope-from=author@anonymousbitcoinbook.com;
	helo=gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com; 
Message-ID: <53586F47.1000606@anonymousbitcoinbook.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 21:56:23 -0400
From: Kristov Atlas <author@anonymousbitcoinbook.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
	rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <CAEz79PrAg=yydd3UOk51wGQUWey-KZHUH1Npzwb=qL+6zTj+pQ@mail.gmail.com>	<53581D1D.1000709@gmail.com>	<CAEz79Poy0XEVyC=nOdhYNVOASvfB-2zHJcjU2hvjA7iDWGDDyw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAS2fgSQ6rh1XKao6pv8BmpeRbtqWfUOVF+C1Fi3LEzY1YcPiA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgSQ6rh1XKao6pv8BmpeRbtqWfUOVF+C1Fi3LEzY1YcPiA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Development Roadmap of Bitcoin Core 0.9.2
Precedence: list


On 04/23/2014 06:28 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> Tails users usually can't really build it from source— talks is a live
> boot mostly stateless linux distribution for privacy applications.
> It's really good in general.
>
> I agree that we shouldn't be statically linking QT on linux generally
> (due to things like theming), though maybe we could just have the
> build process dump out a seperate extra static QT binary just for
> these other cases? I feel like the work maintaining it would be less
> than what we've had in answering questions/complaints about it.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dumping out a separate, extra static QT binary is a great idea.