1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
|
Return-Path: <prayank@tutanota.de>
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 398EFC0011
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:48:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12CC640298
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:48:30 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001,
SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tutanota.de
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id iPwWCQbFe88y
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:48:28 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from w1.tutanota.de (w1.tutanota.de [81.3.6.162])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B02EC4010E
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:48:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from w3.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.164])
by w1.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551A4FBF8C6;
Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:48:26 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1645436906;
s=s1; d=tutanota.de;
h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:References:Sender;
bh=2qXOqg80H9FFtZoH6xcvFCQB4hPLGzbAXtLy/bACJgU=;
b=vClBUFncHv3rjhf3+6xrvPZXoe9EgJA7Sp3hkwkxgFLOYRcCfowmtLULVhVJ7uqG
ELDX2XxSutheLIfYwQKnLwH7eRd5Jf5/+R1XsqDzVYQdji5msu/p9OYiJnu7lkMjUtF
9DXxNV8Een2jzTgZOw6bCtCLavcAemY6FaDnMIQHTd0MwLwrgxinXhM5gNLsyl4mx+d
NDO07I+ctSjerLxCDwHEjzUGwV14aoGWcJNi8rjw/2q8P8MEGbrmrcZrzFW5YqLlER0
ZI32EXdb5X/yo3Bu3TIHOF3p2DdmoyYlVplz9bYmYcfuV6WuPcFKsCq8J+TEAnEVXfs
ZnDouZlDJA==
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 10:48:26 +0100 (CET)
From: Prayank <prayank@tutanota.de>
To: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <MwQfeUc--N-2@tutanota.de>
In-Reply-To: <guj6poK6x0q2u4ku4nmy_rhAsu33nSIyakg5-_NgAUMAOohUUjwaCgCgjHbcUqzx7Fym8AT6EsQginr9YjglDnwRpQTQwiG0sVQadp7_zhI=@protonmail.com>
References: <MtetoOZ--3-2@tutanota.de> <YhAujmus3z69cUl7@petertodd.org>
<CAJowKgKFeDSA5c5ejLyF7R=kEEAY6dtOY1dNV=6eQG2_Dj7eTg@mail.gmail.com>
<MwPDtAD--3-2@tutanota.de>
<guj6poK6x0q2u4ku4nmy_rhAsu33nSIyakg5-_NgAUMAOohUUjwaCgCgjHbcUqzx7Fym8AT6EsQginr9YjglDnwRpQTQwiG0sVQadp7_zhI=@protonmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_274367_185987737.1645436906287"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:54:00 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Stumbling into a contentious soft fork activation
attempt
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:48:30 -0000
------=_Part_274367_185987737.1645436906287
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Goog morning ZmnSCPxj,
Context: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=48.msg329#msg329
Maybe I should have rephrased it and quote Satoshi. I agree I should not speak for others and it was not my intention in the email.
> If Satoshi refuses to participate in Bitcoin development today, who cares what his opinion is?
I care about the opinions especially if consensus rules are not changed and remain same as far as subsidy is concerned.
> Satoshi is dead, long live Bitcoin.
I object to such assumptions about the founder of Bitcoin. Satoshi is more than a pseudonym and will stay alive forever.
--
Prayank
A3B1 E430 2298 178F
Feb 21, 2022, 14:32 by ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com:
> Good morning Prayank,
>
> (offlist)
>
>> Satoshi
>>
>
> I object to the invocation of Satoshi here, and in general.
> If Satoshi wants to participate in Bitcoin development today, he can speak for himself.
> If Satoshi refuses to participate in Bitcoin development today, who cares what his opinion is?
> Satoshi is dead, long live Bitcoin.
>
>
> Aside from that, I am otherwise thinking about the various arguments being presented.
>
>
> Regards,
> ZmnSCPxj
>
------=_Part_274367_185987737.1645436906287
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv=3D"content-type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3DUTF-8=
">
</head>
<body>
<div>Goog morning ZmnSCPxj,<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=
=3D"auto">Context: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3D48.msg329#msg3=
29<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Maybe I should ha=
ve rephrased it and quote Satoshi. I agree I should not speak for others an=
d it was not my intention in the email.<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></di=
v><div dir=3D"auto">> If Satoshi refuses to participate in Bitcoin devel=
opment today, who cares what his opinion is?<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br=
></div><div dir=3D"auto">I care about the opinions especially if consensus =
rules are not changed and remain same as far as subsidy is concerned.<br></=
div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">> Satoshi is dead, lon=
g live Bitcoin.<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">I ob=
ject to such assumptions about the founder of Bitcoin. Satoshi is more than=
a <span><span data-dobid=3D"hdw">pseudonym</span></span> and will stay ali=
ve forever.<br></div><div><br></div><div>-- <br></div><div>Prayank<br></div=
><div><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">A3B1 E430 2298 178F<br></div><div><br></d=
iv><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Feb 21, 2022, 14:32 by ZmnSCPxj@proto=
nmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"tutanota_quote" style=3D"border-le=
ft: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>Good mor=
ning Prayank,<br></div><div><br></div><div>(offlist)<br></div><blockquote>S=
atoshi<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I object to the invocation of Sa=
toshi here, and in general.<br></div><div>If Satoshi wants to participate i=
n Bitcoin development today, he can speak for himself.<br></div><div>If Sat=
oshi refuses to participate in Bitcoin development today, who cares what hi=
s opinion is?<br></div><div>Satoshi is dead, long live Bitcoin.<br></div><d=
iv><br></div><div><br></div><div>Aside from that, I am otherwise thinking a=
bout the various arguments being presented.<br></div><div><br></div><div><b=
r></div><div>Regards,<br></div><div>ZmnSCPxj<br></div></blockquote><div dir=
=3D"auto"><br></div> </body>
</html>
------=_Part_274367_185987737.1645436906287--
|
