Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 10:48:26 +0100 (CET)
From: Prayank <prayank@tutanota.de>
To: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <MwQfeUc--N-2@tutanota.de>
In-Reply-To: <guj6poK6x0q2u4ku4nmy_rhAsu33nSIyakg5-_NgAUMAOohUUjwaCgCgjHbcUqzx7Fym8AT6EsQginr9YjglDnwRpQTQwiG0sVQadp7_zhI=@protonmail.com>
References: <MtetoOZ--3-2@tutanota.de> <YhAujmus3z69cUl7@petertodd.org>
 <CAJowKgKFeDSA5c5ejLyF7R=kEEAY6dtOY1dNV=6eQG2_Dj7eTg@mail.gmail.com>
 <MwPDtAD--3-2@tutanota.de>
 <guj6poK6x0q2u4ku4nmy_rhAsu33nSIyakg5-_NgAUMAOohUUjwaCgCgjHbcUqzx7Fym8AT6EsQginr9YjglDnwRpQTQwiG0sVQadp7_zhI=@protonmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
 boundary="----=_Part_274367_185987737.1645436906287"
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Stumbling into a contentious soft fork activation
 attempt
Precedence: list

------=_Part_274367_185987737.1645436906287
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Goog morning ZmnSCPxj,

Context: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=48.msg329#msg329

Maybe I should have rephrased it and quote Satoshi. I agree I should not speak for others and it was not my intention in the email.

> If Satoshi refuses to participate in Bitcoin development today, who cares what his opinion is?

I care about the opinions especially if consensus rules are not changed and remain same as far as subsidy is concerned.

> Satoshi is dead, long live Bitcoin.

I object to such assumptions about the founder of Bitcoin. Satoshi is more than a pseudonym and will stay alive forever.

-- 
Prayank

A3B1 E430 2298 178F



Feb 21, 2022, 14:32 by ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com:

> Good morning Prayank,
>
> (offlist)
>
>> Satoshi
>>
>
> I object to the invocation of Satoshi here, and in general.
> If Satoshi wants to participate in Bitcoin development today, he can speak for himself.
> If Satoshi refuses to participate in Bitcoin development today, who cares what his opinion is?
> Satoshi is dead, long live Bitcoin.
>
>
> Aside from that, I am otherwise thinking about the various arguments being presented.
>
>
> Regards,
> ZmnSCPxj
>


------=_Part_274367_185987737.1645436906287
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv=3D"content-type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3DUTF-8=
">
  </head>
  <body>
<div>Goog morning ZmnSCPxj,<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=
=3D"auto">Context: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3D48.msg329#msg3=
29<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Maybe I should ha=
ve rephrased it and quote Satoshi. I agree I should not speak for others an=
d it was not my intention in the email.<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></di=
v><div dir=3D"auto">&gt; If Satoshi refuses to participate in Bitcoin devel=
opment today, who cares what his opinion is?<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br=
></div><div dir=3D"auto">I care about the opinions especially if consensus =
rules are not changed and remain same as far as subsidy is concerned.<br></=
div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">&gt; Satoshi is dead, lon=
g live Bitcoin.<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">I ob=
ject to such assumptions about the founder of Bitcoin. Satoshi is more than=
 a <span><span data-dobid=3D"hdw">pseudonym</span></span> and will stay ali=
ve forever.<br></div><div><br></div><div>-- <br></div><div>Prayank<br></div=
><div><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">A3B1 E430 2298 178F<br></div><div><br></d=
iv><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Feb 21, 2022, 14:32 by ZmnSCPxj@proto=
nmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"tutanota_quote" style=3D"border-le=
ft: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>Good mor=
ning Prayank,<br></div><div><br></div><div>(offlist)<br></div><blockquote>S=
atoshi<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I object to the invocation of Sa=
toshi here, and in general.<br></div><div>If Satoshi wants to participate i=
n Bitcoin development today, he can speak for himself.<br></div><div>If Sat=
oshi refuses to participate in Bitcoin development today, who cares what hi=
s opinion is?<br></div><div>Satoshi is dead, long live Bitcoin.<br></div><d=
iv><br></div><div><br></div><div>Aside from that, I am otherwise thinking a=
bout the various arguments being presented.<br></div><div><br></div><div><b=
r></div><div>Regards,<br></div><div>ZmnSCPxj<br></div></blockquote><div dir=
=3D"auto"><br></div>  </body>
</html>

------=_Part_274367_185987737.1645436906287--