1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
|
Return-Path: <gregtonoski@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E1DC0037
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 16 Jan 2024 10:41:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F6961062
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 16 Jan 2024 10:41:01 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org E1F6961062
Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com
header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=DVu3/CAT
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Adgo_aaqpg0a
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 16 Jan 2024 10:41:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102c.google.com (mail-pj1-x102c.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102c])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5502061042
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 16 Jan 2024 10:41:01 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 5502061042
Received: by mail-pj1-x102c.google.com with SMTP id
98e67ed59e1d1-28bec6ae0ffso5772900a91.3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 16 Jan 2024 02:41:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1705401661; x=1706006461;
darn=lists.linuxfoundation.org;
h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from
:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date
:message-id:reply-to;
bh=+yq0W2wYcrP4rKjCpnBQhUbQak4E/7Wr/mxhdmAC3Vw=;
b=DVu3/CATYPQEE8aCWFHGDcv35IitABN+6D1iWXOmK36/PIE5R+rsH/KxEWAYydleHt
4cT2T/BV4D+ZdcHHzXUmWHQ5YUaIycs+mfsBDlX/432KqULzSWOBbhCLQaZvzMEZ2Jv3
m6Xe+7xhiaN3ShKL0S7SB7U7wHN9yE8Onkyc7rmkBotKfQrqErR5EhqiJYMBtn+S7kg1
KNInqcg3D6FImyF0lLDBjTWVl8ztMYEXjtadZDqpIXZ/MckAX5oC8Wm6tGm4NjWVnPa3
LonogXRF3isILMmIJcn2LhU3lZH1eiJSyWnb5C/pLUVCu3tZ0GQussrf5O4EDhJpiwq8
WEEA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705401661; x=1706006461;
h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from
:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=+yq0W2wYcrP4rKjCpnBQhUbQak4E/7Wr/mxhdmAC3Vw=;
b=UKqVIwLwU+t64+tCncD1qsUR9m/NQN1WxL7ZEDWgoucFvvIQEwWe1b2Yw2RULE3Rgq
vIBUZE+Wx7owFqXNqqZlKvHvhWa5uXAA5jz6dN1dhRhK3l0J4mHbUxCLQo1VmCkN1kGt
qZv4W0ReN6IzuYvhEd1On29EJpDcjMEud5t5MEtnVzm8vHs1eIZgWRZdmEfFJrWJprZ9
c4yFY0HZZ03QWwOithv0ZK4m6HNpw0agVDDyFhRbCtk4xuBAGbidbNEBF6F6HTve8EGO
JIB1upg0O7nTXRs3sYR99GKvZvM9kVDyuem46hghHYOuIa3BQsqOiFafsis62FD/Gl1b
94Og==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwJqQN8D4d5tnAHWznrV+4Zl11pvGaC483KAbDGUYXtBKgNZULn
gl3iIsJw6xbWcW41UdHx8ae50j6nVwOBYE1OmSw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHPEEqmSoosOYECNYiYHzY6GBxHTX1EOm7GdHYHUzsUklKAyD1u+GFQc0uaBiMXkoPbDbyqIjjEywXgQLTHM7U=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:77c4:b0:28e:7b0a:8374 with SMTP id
e4-20020a17090a77c400b0028e7b0a8374mr292116pjs.55.1705401660480; Tue, 16 Jan
2024 02:41:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <173813261-12d93c171dc593da018492a4fc8f3f2b@pmq8v.m5r2.onet>
In-Reply-To: <173813261-12d93c171dc593da018492a4fc8f3f2b@pmq8v.m5r2.onet>
From: Greg Tonoski <gregtonoski@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 11:40:48 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMHHROzbQQ1MeegD5_jO8gkyXKLKH+wvgjPKVANYEG=0NT58jQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: vjudeu@gazeta.pl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 10:52:42 +0000
Cc: "bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BUG]: Bitcoin blockspace price discrimination
put simple transactions at disadvantage
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 10:41:02 -0000
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 10:43=E2=80=AFPM <vjudeu@gazeta.pl> wrote:
>
> I think it should be fixed. Because now, sending coins into P2WPKH is che=
aper than sending them to P2TR, even though finally, when those coins are s=
pent, the blockspace usage is cheaper for Taproot (when you spend by key) t=
han for Segwit, because public key hash is not stored anywhere. But of cour=
se, because the cost is splitted between sender and spender, it is more pro=
fitable to send to P2WPKH, and spend from P2TR.
The difference between P2WPKH and P2TR is a different topic, I think.
A single bloated transaction would be treated with higher priority
than a number of simple transactions of the same total size and fee -
irrespectively of P2WPKH and P2TR type.
|
