Return-Path: Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E1DC0037 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 10:41:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F6961062 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 10:41:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org E1F6961062 Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=DVu3/CAT X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.099 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Adgo_aaqpg0a for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 10:41:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pj1-x102c.google.com (mail-pj1-x102c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102c]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5502061042 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 10:41:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 5502061042 Received: by mail-pj1-x102c.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-28bec6ae0ffso5772900a91.3 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 02:41:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1705401661; x=1706006461; darn=lists.linuxfoundation.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=+yq0W2wYcrP4rKjCpnBQhUbQak4E/7Wr/mxhdmAC3Vw=; b=DVu3/CATYPQEE8aCWFHGDcv35IitABN+6D1iWXOmK36/PIE5R+rsH/KxEWAYydleHt 4cT2T/BV4D+ZdcHHzXUmWHQ5YUaIycs+mfsBDlX/432KqULzSWOBbhCLQaZvzMEZ2Jv3 m6Xe+7xhiaN3ShKL0S7SB7U7wHN9yE8Onkyc7rmkBotKfQrqErR5EhqiJYMBtn+S7kg1 KNInqcg3D6FImyF0lLDBjTWVl8ztMYEXjtadZDqpIXZ/MckAX5oC8Wm6tGm4NjWVnPa3 LonogXRF3isILMmIJcn2LhU3lZH1eiJSyWnb5C/pLUVCu3tZ0GQussrf5O4EDhJpiwq8 WEEA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705401661; x=1706006461; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=+yq0W2wYcrP4rKjCpnBQhUbQak4E/7Wr/mxhdmAC3Vw=; b=UKqVIwLwU+t64+tCncD1qsUR9m/NQN1WxL7ZEDWgoucFvvIQEwWe1b2Yw2RULE3Rgq vIBUZE+Wx7owFqXNqqZlKvHvhWa5uXAA5jz6dN1dhRhK3l0J4mHbUxCLQo1VmCkN1kGt qZv4W0ReN6IzuYvhEd1On29EJpDcjMEud5t5MEtnVzm8vHs1eIZgWRZdmEfFJrWJprZ9 c4yFY0HZZ03QWwOithv0ZK4m6HNpw0agVDDyFhRbCtk4xuBAGbidbNEBF6F6HTve8EGO JIB1upg0O7nTXRs3sYR99GKvZvM9kVDyuem46hghHYOuIa3BQsqOiFafsis62FD/Gl1b 94Og== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwJqQN8D4d5tnAHWznrV+4Zl11pvGaC483KAbDGUYXtBKgNZULn gl3iIsJw6xbWcW41UdHx8ae50j6nVwOBYE1OmSw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHPEEqmSoosOYECNYiYHzY6GBxHTX1EOm7GdHYHUzsUklKAyD1u+GFQc0uaBiMXkoPbDbyqIjjEywXgQLTHM7U= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:77c4:b0:28e:7b0a:8374 with SMTP id e4-20020a17090a77c400b0028e7b0a8374mr292116pjs.55.1705401660480; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 02:41:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <173813261-12d93c171dc593da018492a4fc8f3f2b@pmq8v.m5r2.onet> In-Reply-To: <173813261-12d93c171dc593da018492a4fc8f3f2b@pmq8v.m5r2.onet> From: Greg Tonoski Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 11:40:48 +0100 Message-ID: To: vjudeu@gazeta.pl Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 10:52:42 +0000 Cc: "bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BUG]: Bitcoin blockspace price discrimination put simple transactions at disadvantage X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 10:41:02 -0000 On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 10:43=E2=80=AFPM wrote: > > I think it should be fixed. Because now, sending coins into P2WPKH is che= aper than sending them to P2TR, even though finally, when those coins are s= pent, the blockspace usage is cheaper for Taproot (when you spend by key) t= han for Segwit, because public key hash is not stored anywhere. But of cour= se, because the cost is splitted between sender and spender, it is more pro= fitable to send to P2WPKH, and spend from P2TR. The difference between P2WPKH and P2TR is a different topic, I think. A single bloated transaction would be treated with higher priority than a number of simple transactions of the same total size and fee - irrespectively of P2WPKH and P2TR type.