1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <luke@dashjr.org>) id 1RdQ70-0005ei-BT
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:37:54 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54])
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1RdQ6w-0003IK-8P for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:37:54 +0000
Received: from ishibashi.localnet (fl-184-4-160-40.dhcp.embarqhsd.net
[184.4.160.40]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B251B560507;
Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:37:44 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 12:37:39 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.4-gentoo; KDE/4.7.3; x86_64; ; )
References: <CABsx9T3u5onesvWr46ZnKCsYAnxxoLn38PuL6K7RrYqmX8pQHw@mail.gmail.com>
<201112211214.02046.luke@dashjr.org>
<CA+8xBpexr66ahs_+NtuGFNmQvmkp2J5HMCt3j2ysHL=1N-mS3w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+8xBpexr66ahs_+NtuGFNmQvmkp2J5HMCt3j2ysHL=1N-mS3w@mail.gmail.com>
X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: CE5A D56A 36CC 69FA E7D2 3558 665F C11D D53E 9583
X-PGP-Key-ID: 665FC11DD53E9583
X-PGP-Keyserver: x-hkp://subkeys.pgp.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201112211237.40206.luke@dashjr.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-2.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain 0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1RdQ6w-0003IK-8P
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Changes for version 0.6 are being pulled
into HEAD
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:37:54 -0000
On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 12:17:57 PM Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 12:12:43 PM Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
> >> > Accepted for 0.6:
> >> > * 81807c3 (pull 719) Coinbaser
> >>
> >> This is not "accepted" as discussed yesterday on IRC. You need to
> >> find buy-in from some other miners to make sure this is what "they"
> >> want, rather than just what "you" want.
> >
> > It was per Gavin on IRC before yesterday.
>
> Quoting IRC yesterday,
> <gavinandresen> jgarzik: I defer to your judgement on coinbaser, I don't
> care.
[Friday, December 02, 2011] [1:57:14 PM] <gavinandresen> luke-jr: ok-- there
seems to be general consensus to pull coinbaser for 0.6, so I'll probably pull
it before op_eval and rework the op_eval code to use coinbaser.
> > And there is already buy-in from other miners.
>
> Then post data backing up that vague statement.
At least Eclipse (235 GH/s) is using it, and slush (1.3 TH/s) intends to.
|
