Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <luke@dashjr.org>) id 1RdQ70-0005ei-BT
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:37:54 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1RdQ6w-0003IK-8P for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:37:54 +0000
Received: from ishibashi.localnet (fl-184-4-160-40.dhcp.embarqhsd.net
	[184.4.160.40]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
	by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B251B560507;
	Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:37:44 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 12:37:39 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.4-gentoo; KDE/4.7.3; x86_64; ; )
References: <CABsx9T3u5onesvWr46ZnKCsYAnxxoLn38PuL6K7RrYqmX8pQHw@mail.gmail.com>
	<201112211214.02046.luke@dashjr.org>
	<CA+8xBpexr66ahs_+NtuGFNmQvmkp2J5HMCt3j2ysHL=1N-mS3w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+8xBpexr66ahs_+NtuGFNmQvmkp2J5HMCt3j2ysHL=1N-mS3w@mail.gmail.com>
X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: CE5A D56A 36CC 69FA E7D2 3558 665F C11D D53E 9583
X-PGP-Key-ID: 665FC11DD53E9583
X-PGP-Keyserver: x-hkp://subkeys.pgp.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201112211237.40206.luke@dashjr.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-2.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
	domain 0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1RdQ6w-0003IK-8P
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Changes for version 0.6 are being pulled
	into HEAD
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:37:54 -0000

On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 12:17:57 PM Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 12:12:43 PM Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
> >> > Accepted for 0.6:
> >> > * 81807c3 (pull 719) Coinbaser
> >> 
> >> This is not "accepted" as discussed yesterday on IRC.  You need to
> >> find buy-in from some other miners to make sure this is what "they"
> >> want, rather than just what "you" want.
> > 
> > It was per Gavin on IRC before yesterday.
> 
> Quoting IRC yesterday,
> <gavinandresen> jgarzik:  I defer to your judgement on coinbaser, I don't
> care.

[Friday, December 02, 2011] [1:57:14 PM] <gavinandresen> luke-jr: ok-- there 
seems to be general consensus to pull coinbaser for 0.6, so I'll probably pull 
it before op_eval and rework the op_eval code to use coinbaser.

> > And there is already buy-in from other miners.
> 
> Then post data backing up that vague statement.

At least Eclipse (235 GH/s) is using it, and slush (1.3 TH/s) intends to.